• Released on monday 13/02/06
  • Illustrator: Team Chman
  • Uncommon Card Available at the Shop
  • You don't have this character in your collection.
  • Chocomuscle ring icon Allowed in EFC up to Chocomuscle ring
  • icon
  • Browse 121 Market offers

Power of Wanda:

No ability

No ability


Bonus :

-2 Opp Damage, Min 1

If Pussycats loses their fight, the Damage inflicted on Pussycats’s owner will be reduced by 2 points or up to a minimum of 1. If the winning character’s Damage points are lower than or equal to 1, then the Ability has no effect.

First evolution of the 2 different evolutions of this character :

  • PussycatsWandapicture
    Power8AbilityNo ability
    Damage1Bonus-2 Opp Damage, Min 1
    Allowed in EFC up to Chocomuscle ring
  • PussycatsWandapicture
    Power8AbilityNo ability
    Damage2Bonus-2 Opp Damage, Min 1
    Allowed in EFC up to Chocomuscle ring
59 characters
missions icon 26 missions
Bonus -2 Opp Damage, Min 1
Feminists are a thing of the past. Make way for the reign of Double X, XX power! For these hot-blooded women, men are nothing more than a means to satisfy their desires. The Pussycat revolution is here and they’ve got their claws out! And to gain influence in government circles, the Pussycats are quite prepared to strike below the belt…in more ways than one!
  • At level 1: min 3 882 Clintz
  • At level 2: min 3 826 Clintz
Browse 121 Market offers

47 comments on Wanda

Monday 31/01/2011, 17:13

They should unban Wanda if we can't play with "semi-envolved" cards, because now she is only a 8/2 No Ability -2min 1Damage Bonus 2 Stars. And we have Lehane who is 8/2 SOB +8 Attack Unbanned, a few unfair don't you think? I'm not playing with Pussycats these days, but i think this is fair.

Wednesday 30/06/2010, 19:05

Wanda - 8/2 with -2 opp damage, min 1 (bonus)

- A solid 8 power, very impressive for a 2*
- She is only a low, simple 2* which allows you more room for cards like Louise and Charlie.
- Even if she loses, Wanda has the handy Pussycat bonus, reducing damage by 2.
- No weakness to SoA. Perfectly playable against SoB
- Of course, a famous factor of Wanda's is that she retains her amazing 8 power at lvl1. Your opponent generally needs at least one pill to beat Wanda at level one, and Wanda can dominate cards like Striker or Dalhia pill for pill without fear of losing thanks to her low star count in non-random.

- She has no ability. Perfectly acceptable due to her high raw power though.
- Damage isn't impressive, but it's average for a 2*.

Overall: 9.5/10. A few months ago, Wanda would have been a 10. She has solid power. She is usable at a lower level, and she is only 2* at full. However, there are times when I'd use Brittany over Wanda. And there are times when I can't afford a lvl1 Wanda so I use lvl1 Gwen or Svelthlana. Because of those very small reasons, Wanda is still a very decent 9.5. She's very usable at lvl2, and you don't have to worry about constantly rebuying her.

If you do plan on using her at lvl1 though, play her with the mindset of reusing her. If you will not pill lvl1 Wanda in fear that you'd have to rebuy her after, then you're letting your Wanda go to waste. If that's the case, simply use Noon Stevens or Svelthlana, who are cheaper and don't use lvl1 Wanda

Thursday 03/06/2010, 18:18

To all the people who think that Wanda is great at 1 star, I laugh.

When I play ELO and see an un-evolved card I know, for a fact, when I attack your not going to pill and throw this card away. Knowing this I can either have a high damage card lose 2 points of damage (if her bonus is active) and only have to put in one pill at most OR.......let Wanda win so I can have the satisfaction of knowing you just wasted 1800 clintz.

Lets look at why it's foolish to buy her for 1800. Firstly when you get her in your hand your never pleased because you know you have to waste a turn. Secondly you almost never pill her because she costs way too much to replace and you don't want her to win. Well if you don't want her to win why does it matter if her power is 8 or 1? It doesn't!!!!!

So what should you do instead? Svelthlana is a 2/1 with the ability power=power at level 1. The best part, she sells for 200-300 un-evolved! So now you have a card that will equal your opponents power that you don't mind having win a round. If your the type that says she's no good against SOA then you don't get it. I will say it again, it doesn't matter what the power is everybody knows your planning on wasting it. Only difference is with Svelthlana you can go on the offensive, to mess up your opponent, and attack. Throw 3 pills her way to take down a big card instead of having Wanda wait out her inevitable death sentence.

This has been a public service announcement for your benefit and my amusement smiley

Thursday 28/07/2011, 05:32

Rate Green if you think she is hot

Sunday 27/05/2012, 17:39

Maybe Wanda and Wardog are twins, or a couplesmiley
Let us take a look


- Both of their names starts with WA
- Borth of them were released in the same day (13/02/06)
- Both of them have clothes in lvl 1
- Both of them have no clothes in lvl 2 smiley


- Their sex are differencesmiley

Rate smiley if you agree!

Saturday 01/01/2011, 08:01

You know why I think she's geting perma banned? Simple. UR staff are going to implement level locking. What I mean by this, is that at some point in the future, the feature to choose what level you want to play your character at in your deck, with no fear of it levelling up or anything like that.

I mean think about it, the whole levelling up system is pretty stupid, if anything it's quite literally a waste of time, after all, levelling up in lost warehouse is the most boring activity possible and if you want to play a card at particular level you have to buy it over and over again, because once it's levelled up, it's useless to you. This isn't even taking into account all those artworks you never see ingame, and how badly it misleads people who run into the game for the first time. No matter which way you spin it, it's a horrible concept to implement into a trading card game.

UR staff of course, realise this, hence the EXP reserve that was made so you don't have to desroy your brain training your cards, but it's just creating a shortcut for a path that shouldn't exist anyway.

So, if they were to implement level locking, lets think now, the only other base 8 power 1 star is Zatman, I'm pretty sure, and he's already perma-banned, so the OP-ness of the 1 star 8 power will be negated in ELO.

Wanda's ban is made ahead of the probable update, and heralds the day where you'll see a huge shift in the metagame and all kinds of new and interesting possibilities that will stem from the sudden possibilities that playing different levels of cards will produce. Not only that, but you'll be able to see art that was previously only ever seen on the character's description page potentially actually being used in game!

Yes, I know most pre-evo cards are hopeless, but I can't help looking around and thinking whoa... all these levels they bothered to think up stats and draw art and work out what level for ability to come in for... and none of it is even relevant smiley

In any case, even if this isn't what the staff had in mind, it SHOULD be, because the levelling concept is just plain silly smiley

btw, wanda's awesome smiley

rate green for Level Locking!

Wednesday 15/06/2011, 03:46

Lvl 1 : Jacket
Lvl 2 : No Jacket
Thats it lol.

Thursday 26/07/2012, 01:34

taking you clothes off makes you more powerful..

UR logic

Thursday 28/04/2011, 00:13

@ Grimm Gun
ok have you ever tried to make a elo pussy cat deck.
this card is banned because it make s the deck it goes in possible
this card is made for a 55333222 deck or in a 54433222 deck
now think about it with all those great 5* and 4* the clan provides....(oh yeah thats a scary list) and now think of those cards with muse and now Cherry... yeah that scary to a shitless point .

now the problem is that each of those decks require 3 2*s
this is a clan weak point there two stars are so pitiful that when they see a 2 star next to those 5*s they don't even bother pilling to win.
there are 3 exceptions Brittany, Ella, and Wanda they are cards you have to pill against to get a win (except Ella which makes their wining pointless).

oh but wait Wanda is perma banned. so the only card close to replacing her is Effie who with her 6 power if her ability gets you any good damage your not going to win any way because they will out pill and power you.

Wanda was banned for deck building plain and simple. all you people who complain about why card so and so is banned when another clan has the same stats except better that is not banned. it is because of the decks they work in.

im really tired of those types of arguments because most people who have since play mono. if you can play that supposedly better card in your deck then complain.

rate up so idiots can know that interclan comparing and pointless elo ban debates are stupid
if you play it there's a reason its banned.

Monday 09/07/2012, 08:38

she could be the next miss clint city rate if you agreesmiley

Sunday 27/05/2012, 17:41


Both of their states are the same, without their bonus!!

Thursday 22/12/2011, 07:13

Once more Team Chman´s extreme lack of imagination strikes a card smiley

Sunday 05/02/2012, 05:51

she is so awsome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!smileysmileysmileysmiley

Sunday 18/03/2012, 23:31

Here --> I love Lucy smiley