First evolution of the 4 different evolutions of this character :

  • GHEISTXU52picture
    Power1AbilityUnlock ability at
    Damage4BonusStop Opp. Ability
  • GHEISTXU52picture
    Power2AbilityUnlock ability at
    Damage5BonusStop Opp. Ability
  • GHEISTXU52picture
    Power4AbilityUnlock ability at
    Damage7BonusStop Opp. Ability
  • GHEISTXU52picture
    Power6Ability-8 Opp Attack, Min 2
    Damage8BonusStop Opp. Ability

Power of XU52:

-8 Opp Attack, Min 2

The opponent’s Attack points are reduced by 8 points or up to a minimum of 2. If the opponent’s number of Attack points are lower or equal to 2, then the ability has no effect.


Bonus :

Stop Opp. Ability

The opponent’s Ability is cancelled if they have one.

72 comments on XU52

Sunday 25/07/2010, 20:35

I love his looks at lvl 3. Whos a fat piece of plasma, you are.

Thursday 16/09/2010, 12:51

I wonder if Lou, Fuzz and XU52 go out drinking on weekends together?

Sunday 13/12/2009, 09:13

XU52 competes with Rolph for the title of best 5-star GHEIST. When it comes to big-pill fights to the death, Rolph is definitely superior but XU52 has another use entirely. Xu's role is to go in with 0-3 pillz and either scare the opponent into massively overpilling or get his enormous 8 damage in. Many people will expect you to 6-pill a card with this much damage and simply decide not to pill and let it through, which pretty much seals the match.

Perhaps Xu52's most important quality is one that has not been mentioned by anyone yet: his attack reduction minimum of 2 is lower than Uppers, Sakrohm, and certainly Montana! This means that in zero-pill fights he will get in his 8 damage against these clans, leaving them no choice but to pill. Since GHEIST's main weakness aside from Roots is a good attack manipulation deck, having this advantage is a huge boon to any GHEIST deck.

Xu52's presence is felt in any game he's in, definitely give him a try!

Tuesday 13/12/2011, 06:02

Not sure if anyone's said this, but he's Hawk s opposite. Hawk = 8 power 6 dmg. XU52= 6 power 8 dmg. Both SoA (in opposite places) and one is +8 atk, the other -8 :3

Tuesday 01/01/2013, 02:46

"Lou: 2200 Clintz
XU52: 11,800 Clintz
Guess the ELO usage makes all the difference."

Sure. It has nothing to do with the fact one is a rare and the other is uncommon. Or the fact that GHEIST decks are far more prevalent then Roots ATM. I am not saying that ELO doesn't help a lot but that is not the only factor at all.

Tuesday 09/07/2013, 18:20

Compare to Fuzz. Excpet he is a GHEIST so BAN. Not Fuzz though everyone love the junks smiley

Thursday 02/02/2012, 00:07


Monday 25/08/2014, 15:43

Maybe if we had made it to four collectors in the event, he would have been our fourth one. It did say his name at first, anyway.

Tuesday 10/02/2009, 19:12

An awesome card all around one of my faves! smiley While the 5* spot always goes to Rolph in elo, XU52 is just really fun to use. 8 dmg is enough to make sure an opponent pills. -8 min 2 means that if you ever run into a no pill battle XU52 is unstoppable. The sheer coolness of the character alone makes the card worth the price!!! soa is a must in elo as every uses cards that have very high powered abilities *copper* cough. even with the anti soa Jungo coming in the soa clans are still really strong. This card will always have a place in my heart and is my favorite ghiest. Gosh a bluff with this guy is sure to draw some attention!!
6/8 -8 opp atk min 2
SOA bonus.
when I draw this card I almost always make my opponent pay!

Tuesday 19/07/2011, 03:17

For some reason, this is not banned, but Lou, which is a carbon copy, is...

Tuesday 14/08/2012, 02:49

lvl 4 is the tyrant from resident evil

Saturday 08/12/2012, 05:35

Now just think about this, XU52, Boyle, Lou and Fuzz all around the same overall, but look at the price.
Boyle - 2k
XU52 - 20k
Lou - 2k
Fuzz - 4k.

Now Boyle, Lou and Fuzz are all the same, but Fuzz cost double the price, while XU52 has 8- atk instead of 8+ atk. and cost 10 times the price of Lou and Boyle, but 2 1/2 times more. But still doesn't that mean that Lou, Boyle and Fuzz should have their avg price around only 3k? But XU52 has attack reducer, so make him fight Fuzz, Lou or Boyle. 8-Atk VS 8+atk, they would both be canceled so that means the Avg price for XU52 should be around 3k too. Not 20k

Saturday 08/12/2012, 05:37

Lvl 2- Hey stop looking at my naked body you pervert!
Lvl 3- Im not a fat piece of plasma :c
Lvl 4- Bitch ima get chu fo callin me yo fat piece o plasma.
Lvl 5- Whatchu lookin at policeman, i didn;t kill him, I found him.


Tuesday 19/03/2013, 17:31

Why he dont have lvl 1 look???

Tuesday 04/03/2014, 17:14

Eclipse-Sensei - Guru - The Trend
Tuesday 19/07/2011, 02:17
For some reason, this is not banned, but Lou, which is a carbon copy, is...

Tech nine - Hero - URBAN MADNESS
Tuesday 09/07/2013, 17:20
Compare to Fuzz. Excpet he is a GHEIST so BAN. Not Fuzz though everyone love the junks

You both fail to see the difference between -8 and +8.
-8 means that everyone is reduced by 8 attack. At 0 pilling, the - become more important than the +.
In the following scenarios, all are 0 pill. Only abilities that will affect the winner in the battle are shown.

+ Power
Willy+Ambre, which is the highest power that comes to my mind, at 14, with his bonus.
Willy will have 14-8 attack which is 6, assuming XU doesn't have his bonus active.
That would be a tie in power. A win for XU with his bonus. Same as + Attack

- Power
Any card with - power will be brought down to 2 attack, even if they are Bangers/ ulu and have 8 power.
Assuming XU isn't lowered to 2 power or below, and he can't SOA he would win. Same as + Attack

+ Attack
Any card would have to beat XU's +8 and his base of 6. Most Sentinel and Junkz could easily do this, even with XU's SOA. This is the same as +8 Attack.

- Attack
Most cards don't go as low as XU's minimum of 2, but if they do, they would win. Usually, however, XU wins. Clans like Sakrohm, Montana and Uppers all have HIGHER minimums than 2. This would mean XU is at their of 3, while they are at 2.

If XU had +8, he would be at Montanas minimum of 8, and Uppers would bring him down to 4, Sak down to 6. Many cards have a higher base Power than 4 and 6, and would beat him, but since he lowers to 2, they HAVE to pill to win, or they take 8 damage. The +8 attack wouldn't help in any similar scenarios, as no + has a max or min value. Thats the only reason why -8 is better, but it creates bluff power that noone would expect.