Personally , I was very fond of the summer changes in
ELO in general, especially the
Leader clan ban.
Leaders is the only clan that makes things uneven between players of very different levels. A level 15 player can get lucky when opening a
pack and get highly priced cards which they can sell and create a deck (a friend of mine got Tanaereva which he sold and created a really nice deck), but in most cases these players won't get
Morphun untill level 45. So , I would like to see the Leaders remain banned. In theory , that closes the gap between higher and lower level players and make it as narrow as it can be.
The staff banned cards should remain banned , as they were banned for a good reason.
As for the extra list of banned cards...Well, I had only few objections but in general , yes I believe it was a fair list.
Trying to observe the meta-gaming after a round of
ELO , it was hard to see what people would play, especially in low
ELO scores and it only became clearer at higher
ELO scores (1275+) which was a bit odd as you would think that all the clans are equal in theory but that was not the case at all. What made me a bit upset though , was that 3 out of 5 players used the same deck which was a bit disappointing when looking at it from a deck-builder perspective.
That's all for now