Personally , I was very fond of the summer changes in ELO
in general, especially the Leader
Leaders is the only clan that makes things uneven between players of very different levels. A level 15 player can get Lucky
when opening a pack
and get highly priced cards which they can sell and create a deck (a friend of mine got Tanaereva which he sold and created a really nice deck), but in most cases these players won't get Morphun
untill level 45. So , I would like to see the Leaders remain banned. In theory , that closes the gap between higher and lower level players and make it as narrow as it can be.
The staff banned cards should remain banned , as they were banned for a good reason.
As for the extra list of banned cards...Well, I had only few objections but in general , yes I believe it was a fair list.
Trying to observe the meta-gaming after a round of ELO
, it was hard to see what people would play, especially in low ELO
scores and it only became clearer at higher ELO
scores (1275+) which was a bit odd as you would think that all the clans are equal in theory but that was not the case at all. What made me a bit upset though , was that 3 out of 5 players used the same deck which was a bit disappointing when looking at it from a deck-builder perspective.
That's all for now