Why your pilled Rolph
can defeat a 0-pilled Wendel
is the same reason why your 0-pilled Bristone
can block 3 damages off a pilled hitter. It was exactly your suggesting of Bristone
that make me feel strange and reply to you in the same style, and this would remind you that the game is not simple as you suggest.
If you are attacking , you hold on to Rolph
, and Bristone
during early rounds. OK, let's admit you have lower chance to win the first two rounds against attack manipulators(Why? normally GHEIST
has to pay 2 more pills to win a round especially in low pills). Then you have left Bristone
in hands and have to win both rounds. In this case finally you could let Bristone
block 3 damages, but you lost fight. Ok, even when you manage to win last two rounds, 4+6 damage can not guarantee a victory in many of the cases.
If you are defending, no opponent will put out a heavy hitter in front of your Bristone
unless he has more than two of them. Want a small pills win against attack manipulators? Come and try your luck, wasting 2 more pills is the best situation for you, sometimes 3-4.
On that stand, It is not often that both sides have the same number of pills, but it is quite often that you as a GHEIST
have less than 5 pills in endgame while your opponent has more than 6. You must be kidding, within 5 pills, even Rubie
can beat most of the GHEIST
cards(7 powered) pill for pill.