40enSat, 10 Nov 2012 17:51:59 GMTSat, 10 Nov 2012 17:51:59 GMTpacks.. I used to make 5 credits a day and in 2 weeks I could buy New Blood packs now I make 3 free credits a day... We need a regular DT room without any bans or penalties so some of us can use the cards we payed good money for and still get our free credit.. Even when u use real cash to get these badass cards u encounter bans and penalties and if u make a decent 26-29 star deck u WILL be unevenly matched with a 55 star deck... Every time it happens to me I just laugh .....]]>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:20:51 GMT
If you like to play 25* there are elo, dm25* and surv elo
if you like to play 30*-40* there are DT, DM and surv
if you like to play 23-28*, WHERE do you play?

uh, forgot...there's training
]]>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:04:50 GMT Changes are here:

http://www.urban-rivals.com/community/forum/?mode=viewsubject&forum_page=0&id_subject=2228705&subject_page=0#answers]]>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:43:53 GMT Actually, the other half could be 2,2,2,1 to hit the 23* point, as there isn't anything restricting the use of underleveled cards.]]>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:06:37 GMT since now there are only few players who are playing standard fromat i can tell you that its hard for the system to find you an opponent in level format.
so may be sometimes it selects a player from level 2 to fight against you.]]>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:11:33 GMTWed, 24 Oct 2012 14:32:20 GMT]]>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:17:16 GMT]]>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:01:36 GMTTue, 03 Jul 2012 09:13:41 GMTTue, 03 Jul 2012 08:57:45 GMT
edited by Artemis-BZ Tuesday 03/07/2012, 10:57]]>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:25:19 GMTSurvivor with an E25/ELO compatible deck and every time it is the same result. I end up paired up with a massive 35~40* deck.

I tried playing in the new Deathmatch format and reached the same conclusion (you fight the exact same player/deck over and over in the small deathmatches)

Each Game Mode, (Tourney, Survivor, Deathmatch) needs a limited deck 25* room... either E25 or ELO.

Please bring these formats back.]]>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:11:28 GMT
-We know that many different rooms/modes can be maintained(issues of balance aside.) We can safely assume that, because there doesn't seem to be any kind of cap on Event rooms, for example. So, consolidating rooms seems to be an effort to keep players together, thereby allowing the matchmaking system to find matches faster, ensuring that players don't run into the same opponent over and over, etc.

-Shutting down any room causes resistance. Players like options, and who can blame them?

-The ideal solution would keep most rooms/game modes available, while still consolidating the player population somehow.

-So, I propose this: Why not have rewards that cycle on a weekly basis? Week 1 can have additional, lucrative rewards in Extended, Week 2 in Standard, Week 3 in ELO, etc etc. Maybe any player who performs above a certain threshold should have a chance at the rewards (as with the Cr chance in DTs.) The majority of the player base will be encouraged to play more in a specific format for much of the week in pursuit of these rewards, but people who have a strong preference for one specific mode will still have the option to keep playing it for as long as they please. It seems like both the goal of consolidating the player base and not alienating players by shutting down modes they enjoy can be achieved this way.]]>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:43:34 GMTFri, 15 Jun 2012 16:49:23 GMT
Couldn't agree more with you]]>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:20:48 GMTMon, 11 Jun 2012 17:07:55 GMTThu, 07 Jun 2012 16:49:21 GMTFrozn mono-playable over the next month" than not hearing anything at all.

Not everybody is going to agree with the decisions the developers make, but keeping us in the loop would have at least showed some respect... ]]>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:36:03 GMT

Doesn't work. In tournament, my 17 star deck is frequently fighting _hands_ that are 15-16 stars.]]>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 09:31:09 GMT]]>