40enFri, 28 Oct 2011 23:54:43 GMTFri, 28 Oct 2011 23:54:43 GMT
Putting one pill is very important. Sometimes even 2 if you anticipate your opponent will guess the bluff.
This is very important for attack manipulation clans.
The best way to use them is to wait until the last 2 turns, that is when the magic happens.
Attack manipulation is a huge advantage in low-pill battles. People tend to use cards like Brittany and Arkn near the beginning as a bluff and force your opponent to waste pills. WRONG!
Let's say Bangers vs Sakrohm. Bangers bonus is profitable after 4 pills.
So in the beginning when pills are plentiful. It is better not to pill but bluff.
Near the end, rounds 3-4, one pill can matter a lot, especially if its a low pill battle.
Your opponent used some pills, you have say a 2 pill advantage because you've bluffed the first 2 rounds.
6 pills to 4 pills. Actually, its 8 pills to 4 pills because of your bonus. A completely dominant pills amount.

That is why cards with both Attack Manipulation and DR are one of the greatest combos. Helping you get over the first 2 turns relatively unscathed.
People say Fabio is better than Spiaghi or Jeremy.
I say otherwise.
With attack manipulation: Good players win in 2 rounds, The best players win in 4.

P.S. 1200 words, quite long so thanks for reading.]]>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:50:41 GMTRescue mono ( with Ghoub and Wesley ) and opp doesnt have mono ( which is too common in central station where i fite ) im lvl 13 novice ]]>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:49:45 GMTRescue mono ( with Ghoub and Wesley ) and opp doesnt have mono ( which is too common in central station where i fite ) im lvl 13 novice ]]>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:43:44 GMTBaldovino (eh, RARELY)... with Gil (I'd say almost NEVER) for 2 damage, not worth the risk unless you get a crazy -pill vs. -pill battle... and even still. You playing style and the cards you up against play a huge role.

if your opp has two SOA (as and ability) cards, I would never 7 pill anything opening round. Sorry to rant, I just play with pill manipulation a lot and knowing that there is a difference between Gil and Dalhia drives me rant CRAZY!

Happy hunting guys]]>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 22:39:07 GMTBaldovino or Gil]]>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:37:26 GMT Ohhh! That's actually really helpful, thanks! ]]>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:58:26 GMT
In a no pill fight, between, o, let's say, Caelus and Robb. Neither pilled. Winner: Robb.

More pillz fight, Robb would still winn, because he only has 3 stars, in opposition to Caelus 's big 5 stars.]]>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:39:04 GMTThu, 05 Aug 2010 04:37:29 GMT
you do realize that my comment was made "ages" ago when equal attacks would still select a winning card at random?]]>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:34:04 GMTHikiyousan who used 1 pill. got an attack of 20. sadly i used 0 pillz. also moderators aren't different from normal players. just have special rights and they can moderate the actions of normal players.]]>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:00:50 GMTFri, 30 Jul 2010 18:13:37 GMTMontana deck if u give one pill to the many 7 power in mmontana the opponenet will usually need at least 2 pills to get out of ur range if he is a six or a seven or if u have Hugo in ur team u dont need the pillz]]>Wed, 26 May 2010 12:51:05 GMTWed, 26 May 2010 03:48:32 GMTSat, 13 Mar 2010 10:09:52 GMT also sometimes if your card loses it doesn't change the outcome of the game, in which case there is no point in pilling. you've got to do the math]]>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:48:50 GMTArno or Chloe, people always think they are played without any pillz...]]>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:18:01 GMT]]>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:57:54 GMTFri, 14 Aug 2009 03:46:16 GMT
I won alot of matches back then.. But things are evolving and it is hard to stay ontop when everyone begins to learn new tricks..

I honestly believe placing NO pillz on your cards have become a need-to now days!]]>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:02:58 GMT]]>