"My biggest concern is that you've taken deck construction for ELO
and made it a much more complex affair."
No I haven't. I've added one new stipulation, it's hardly complex itself and it's definitely not MUCH more complex.
So let's say we go with the tier one list only. We simply take all the cards that we we agree on as a consensus to be slightly too powerful, denote them as tier 1 by marking them somehow, then adding this to the Elo
deck build list:
Your Deck can only contain 2 tier one cards.
That's really very simple.
"What Im trying to say is for instance- GHEIST
tier 2 cards will still be much more stronger than The Freaks
tier 2s, and so on...
I dont think you can balance the sistem by adding a new tier list..."
Who's to say that Freaks
would have ANY tier one cards? You've made a lot of assumption here instead of asking questions about an idea you clearly don't understand.
It has NOTHING to do with star count. The tier system would be about cards that are considered slightly too powerful. Toro
would be a tier one card as a 4*, as would Smokey Cr
as a 3*, as would (potentially) Spiaghi
as a 2*.
"I dont think you can balance the sistem by adding a new tier list..."
Limiting the use of the cards that are seen to be overpowered would prevent decks from being full of the obvious cards BUT would allow you to use these cards still.