@216 : I mostly agree
Sigma,
Uranus: 5/5 obviously, why weren't they banned earlier!?
Gil: 4/5 a very strong card indeed, but not the best and not in the best clan either. But a fine choice, no problem.
Kerry: 3.5/5
Rescue probably needed one extra perma-ban and
Kerry was the best choice in my opinion. But by herself she is not a perma-bannable card... but it was a necessary evil to balance her whole clan.
Yayoi: 2.5/5 This is a very strong card but not perma-ban material. Her clan is underwhelming at the moment and
Yayoi is one of the only reliable and strong damage dealer for the
Pussycats... If anything,
Charlie could have stayed perma-ban instead.
Other side of the annoucement :
Charlie: 4/5 A strong card but not game-breaking. She can be player-banned every now and then but doesn't need to be perma-ban. A good decision.
Wanda: 3.5/5 Usuable only in her 2-star form she is a fair card. Strong but fair. Nonetheless, the
Pussycats have a natural advantage with low-star cards and this is their best. Now there is a real 8-star half-deck possible in
ELO that could be very strong! Maybe a dangerous decision but players can deal with it with player votes if necessary.
Overall. I think these are good changes.