Just have to state, Hungry Panda, you have 616 cards, out of 791, and if you dont have, to quote you, "one good card to use", then something is seriously wrong with you. Some of the cards dont deserve to be on the ban list, that sure, but majority of them do, or would you like to see every deck consisting of, for example, DJ Korr Cr, Rowdy, Gil, Flanagan, GraksmxxT, Uranus, Sigma, Nimestiec, and so on, would it be fun in ELO now? (and no, dont start about price and many players cant afford that kind of deck, there are many players that can afford less costly but equally, and Im sure more deadly deck than this), so dont you whine and put together some deck and play this game, and next week, if you cant use some cards, use other, because, imagine this, we all do that.
I agree with The_HoAx, I think it would be a great reality check to see what the majority of players think. I think if you multiplied the votes from elo by 6 for a week, would give about enough votes for 1200+ players to vote once on those 25-45 that would possibly be banned. Because the usual couple of votes would leave a lot of cards untouched that really should be voted on, as seen in last week's format election with characters such as Lou, and Arno, and Bridget not being able to bring in the 5% required to be banned. With so many cards to be decided, I doubt that they could get even the 1.5% required, and who knows if people would have voted for or against them?
@ Hungry Panda.... you will get to the TOP of what? your highest ELO score is 1300-ish.... start blasting 1400's every week and honestly you can then complain about ELO bans
if you are just breaking into this game, yeah, sucks
if you are highly skilled with certain clans that get you 1400 elo scores, sure, complain
a guy who has a 1325 as his high shouldn't complain about basically, nothing. we all have to play by these rules.
considering only about 30% of people vite anyways... I mean who cares really