@tiny dog, you can't be more wrong. For one thing, a card with pouson 2 has potency of 7 impact without fury, and assuming that it would have 3 would make 10. Did you really think that ur would make a 2* with that ability? Especially in Skeelz? 3* is possible, but maybe itd need a higher min. All in all, a Cyb Lhia for Skeelz was really what i wanted.
(win round 1, 1 damage(nothing), next end of round 2(3), end of round 3(5), and end of fight(7). Just figured id clear up poison).
@tanto89, Krung has uses. If you don't like power of heegrn, and cant afford xodus or dagg(although i for one would take Lovhak, then Lehrg, then Kronnen, and then him). He also has a mission attatched to him. Shayna and Buck aredebatebly better than eddie. The sheer damage of Buck is nice, and shaynas power is so threatening it scares me even today. Eddie can help dodge dr, and that can be useful. I think i had underrated him a little, but he has talent(whats with common good cards for Ulu Watu? First Stanly, now eddie). I will however state that we should most definitely not hub about his max 13(best healing, however not particularly that useful. Maybe in half pussycat deck).
about Krung.. like you said. he is can be used if you want, but he is in fourth or more position in Vortex 4 stars.
how many 4 stars are you going to use in one deck? most likely 3 cards, and he is the fourth one
now with Qorah, it might be the final blow. he will not be used too much in competitive ELO anymore
maybe can be used in T2 for cheap shot with Dregn or C Beast
about eddie, I rarely sees shanya in competitive deck.
what do you mean shanya sheer power? she is 11 power while eddie is 10 power
plus, eddie is more solid with 8 power while shanya needs her bonus to become 8 power
eddie has 2 more power and 2 less damage than shanya against SOA,
and 1 less power but better ability against SOB
for Buck, like I said before, it depends. if you like solid damage then Buck is better
although, Buck is in a tight space in Ulu Watu.
his 7 damage is nice, but it is hard to connect it (to do KO even with fury) with their team mates as most of them has 4 damage
Buck is not typical Ulu Watu cards (which has solid power) he is a little bit brittle which is why I don't really like him.
if I need
eddie can open many possibilities. yes he cannot do KO, but he has potential of making 9-11 life gaps (3-5 damage and 6 heal). I believe he is worth consideration as staple of 4 stars Ulu Watu
IMO, people are more concern with Ulu Watu 5 stars since they have too many selections of good 5 stars
@tinydog, sigma has a high min for old elo. Not to mention she is not from Skeelz, which in a sense makes her much more ok. She is one of(maybe only) poisoner in her clan, Skeelz have two others. If we got another like Greem, im sure people would be scared of it, a good element for cards, but not too much. Since people complain about the high minimum, the solution is to lower the minimum. Btw, sigma has 4 damage, and combined with her poison makes 16 impact. Fury + Timber gives her highest impact in the game. Then kenny and Kreen Cr.
@tanto89, since 11 is highest power without Ambre, i always get scared of it as opposed to other cards. Just that high power makes me feel hopeless of winning. 10 is very close(probably not much difference), but just the fear inspired can be a good asset. Eddie i will say is the most stable of all the 4*'s within the clan, but he he can be put in a poor deck(with Numar, Oraya, or George).
Just trying to remind people when looking at cards for elo, when standard finaly comes out, elo will only be starter deck cards, leaders, and cards of the past 2 years
so remember unless they do change the 2 year thing for standard in elo, eddie's ONLY competition at 4* currently is Numar,
todd's ONLY posion competition currently is a 5* defeat card that has poison 1 min 0, so you either get poison 2 min 5, deal them 1 damage, and win that round, or you get poison 1 min 0, lose with a 7 damage card, and you take damage from their card