*disclamer* just to start this of i am not some pro l33t player or anything like that and this just my opinion and it is subject to change.
GHEIST their bonus is just so damn stong and well their cards are much better than their counterpart the Roots imo, i dont think they are the best and they have their weakness "like SoB" and their mono decks arent as stong with the recent perma banns
Montana that attack reduction is just insane, they have so many good cards like Mona, Griezzo and Spiaghi probably the best clan, makes a nice mono or half deck
Skeelz so solid good in a half deck, mono and splash does pretty much every thing. nuff said
Piranas before i get started i have to say they are my main "well used to be" their bonus is really good, clans that need it like Rescue and GHEIST are just slaughtered most of their cards have huge power, pill manipulation is real strong Scrubb can just overpill and get away with it. Only down side half deck isnt so strong imo and their perma banns really make a difference.
Vortex their clan bonus is so forgiving and allows you to make huge plays and not geting punished for it, however the main problem is their bonus doent win fights. btw they are on the edge of being top of tier 2 but im nice like that.
ok so thats the end of tier 1 i just wanna say that thats not in any order and that if your favourite clan isnt there tier 2 is still very viable they just have down sides that tier 1 dont.
@Kitsune: Nothing against you in the least, I am just curious... What goes through your head when better ELO players disagree with you? You defend your points of view against people who have much higher top ELO scores, multiple Cr wins, etc. Not trying to discourage you by any means -- I'd just like to point out that most of this stuff really isn't matter of opinion, but fact. Some cards outperform others. Some clans outperform others. That's not an "in the right hands..." thing, but a general truth.
So, what makes you think that players who score better than you are less right than you are? Please, don't take this the wrong way, you are entitled to write anything you like on these boards, and I disapprove of anyone who would insult you for the conclusions you've drawn... I'm just curious as to how you drew those conclusions.
Lol. That clan tier list is obviously incorrect. I propose a new one:
Fang Pi Clang
Jungo clearly rules ELO at this point in time. There huge life gaps and fantastic supporting 2*'s are in complete synergy with the big hitters (Askai, Troompah etc.). This is just a rough idea of what the clans should look like, don't hold me too it if some of the clans are a little wrong.
Quick question: Do the tiers rank clans by popularity or by what top players use? Cuz Jungo is popular in part because their staples are quite cheap for beginners. Likewise, I imagine Bangers would be far more popular if Blaaster Cr sold for 1k instead of 100k. Many newer players gravitate towards SOB clans after getting pushed around by Jackies and Marcos in fight club, so NM and Piranas have always been overrepresented.
@Cyber - I know, I just copy and pasted the old list and rearranged the clans. Lazy
@SyN_KILLIC_X - Freaks only function well when either Olga or Bogdan are unbanned. Even then they are easily beaten. They are fairly good though.
@subclavianHoA - They are ranked by functionality on a scale of:
Cards banned frequently
If the clan is still usable if key cards are banned
Match winning potential
And simplest of all, the 'good' cards in the respective clan :)
That's the criteria I followed to get this result.
Personally I would put in 5 tier's only, but Come at Me's list is better than the other guy's