Quoting Raw_Shanks' ranking again,
(these 2 really boil down to preference) Lady Glenn Jeeves
In this case, lets say I don't have Dorian
. Both seemed to be great cards.
Damage is important. BUT, Herman
is better in mono or 5-3, 6-2. In this case, it is not about preference. It is a matter of who is indeed BETTER and stable. In ELO
, a good hand is half the battle won. What if you draw Herman
without its bonus? Unless you really needs damage, playing 2HKO (which doesn't happen often in 14 life), Hefty
So, the oracle, do you know why it is pointless to come up with such a tier system?
"@cyber then there really is no point in starting forums anyway.... wow
ok everyone has different preferences for Piranas
5*s if you check out this week Lizbeth
is on top of the elo
election list, 9 power with sob is very threatening in the right hands, something that Selma
cant boast. of course Selma
is stable, but stable does not necessary win you games."
This thread is indeed pointless. Look at ghelas' thread on ELO
. That is a better quality kind of thread for discussion.
I can debate with you when Lizbeth
is better than Selma
and when it is the other way round.