I've been playing some elo games, and I've seen alot of different types of decks.
( ALOT OF MONTANAS )
But, there are a few clans I rarely seen in elo
-Fang Pi Clang
But I faced alot of
I've also faced alot of
-Montana ( duh )
And of course, alot of
And so on and so forth
-lots of junkz but not Sentinel
-Piranas but not Nightmare
-Jungo and not freaks
Why is that? Are they better in other mode?
Umm la junta are pretty common now....
fang pi clang is about average actually
montana is just kinda lame and noob no skill
uppers is pretty good in general
sakrohm starting to rise with their new op card
ulu watu is about average, depends on eddie
bangers is useless without beeboy, and even worse without blaastar cr, both banned means unusable.
junkz is stable, sentinel is bad (only mono and no good SoA)
piranas is ok people think lizbeth is really good. fairly balanced clan lacks DR tho
nightmare are actually ok, but all usable cards have
Any clan can be effective, even with star performers banned. Bangers is a great example. While Beeboy and Blaaster Cr are by far their best ELO cards, a half deck of Angie, Vermyn N, Randal, and B Ball is still strong. Nightmare is still great, but the featured pillz strategy of Piranas is more popular.
People(myself included) focus quite a bit on the "best" cards. Other options are still viable, and FUN!
@lafoote you clearly am not an elo player....
angie vermyn N Randal B Ball yah looks fine on paper, once you face SoB (piranas and nightmare mainly) its gg. not great anything else. yah VIABLE but will definitely not get you above 1300.
well depends on your goal, try something easier and still fun, like uppers.
You guys act like people never played bangers before they 'printed' Beeboy. I know it was like 6 months ago, but if you think real hard, you may remember.
The problem is that Ulu Watu has more stable cards compared to Bangers
@lafoote umm... it is caleld power creep. and the reason they were used was because of something called shann..... think before you post.