Hello, I am interested at playing daily tournaments with decks that are around 25* and 30*. (for now I am not interested at playing with lower stars decks)
Most people at my guild say that 25* and 30* are the ideal for tournaments.
But as we cand see from the chart at tourney section help, 31* decks can fight up to 40* decks. But 30* can fight up to 35. So 31* isn't better for scoring more points cause we can fight players with up to 40* decks? (to find more opponents that we could benefit with the extra points winned for diifference between decks)
So with that in mind we should make 26* decks instead of 25* cause 26 can fight up to 31 (25 is up to 30)
Thanks for your time!
I actually think winning with 40* deck is near impossible, and your friend may be slightly exaggerating. There are just no possibilities to cram in 8 good 5* cards without incurring penalties, unless your friend played some advanced Tiny Cuts involving lots of high-star cards. Meh.
Of course, I'm one of those who say 40* decks are horrible. Simply because one talented player may have won a tourney with one, doesn't mean that the option is instantly viable.
I'm sure Michael Jordan could win an NBA championship without wearing shoes and while wearing baggy pants and a hoodie, but that doesn't mean doing so is a good idea.