@Forky You say baseless, but we have the abilities and bonuses from all clans to consider and theorize new ways to keep UR interesting and innovative. It may be pointless to predict a possible new clans Bonus, but not baseless and as you can see, there are a few of us who like "baseless conjecture."
@Thoazol I could see the Defeat proposition as improbable, but I think it may have some use against DR's and people are playing the h3ll out of Pussycats right now. As far as courage, I think it would be unfair to have a +10 Attack Bonus if it wasn't conditional. There are some players who use clans that don't have an Attack manipulation, and when they go up against Montana or Uppers, etc., it could prove a bit difficult. That Courage: +10 Attack could even the odds. They're just ideas anyways, cheers.
@_-3993-_ I say this because guessing a character's abilities by virtue of who he beats in comics is irrational and useless. I understand some of you like arguing pointlessly on this topic, yes a few of you like baseless conjecture. Can't stop you from that.
@ Forky How do you think the developers of this game thought of ways to counter each clan and make it interesting? They brainstormed and threw ideas around. It doesn't matter that this new guy beats up Montana in the comics, it's about creating something we haven't seen before by which some of us have some creativity to lend. It looks like you have negativity to lend. And btw, NOW I'm arguing.
Well if it means anything at all, the Date on the invitation poster of page 2 says 5/17/13, so we've got about 9 days of baseless conjecture left before we find out.
The bonus is defently courage, that's all i'm sayin'
I can hardly wait to see what we're in store for.
I love a good argument, which means an argument that I win. I love how you compare yourselves to the devs by brainstorming ideas, but all you're doing is spouting out abilities and bonuses without insight into the game. It's not negativity, it's realism. Your tone, i.e. "we have ideas to lend" is now the crux of my argument. Boostr will not listen to your ideas, nor will they care, especially with this hypothetical new clan coming out soon. Ergo, everything you and the other developer wannabes say is useless, pointless, and of no merit whatsoever. You can continue arguing, but honestly, it's pointless.
@Forky You absolutely have the wrong idea of what this forum is about. I'm not suggesting any of my ideas could be even considered, but I do have ideas. I like this game, and I like talking about any new thing that comes from it. You may have the impression that you think I'm some sort of pretentious guru of the UR universe, but that's so wrong. We're discussing this new character because WE LIKE TO PLAY THIS GAME. That's all it's about.
Good job, Forky Bard, YOU WIN!! Give him a cookie...you're rigidness is unparalleled.
"How do you think the developers of this game thought of ways to counter each clan and make it interesting? They brainstormed and threw ideas around." This is your counterargument against my comment that YOUR brainstorming is pointless. You believe that by throwing your ideas around you somehow provide "interesting" abilities that the devs *might* use, which is further by this statement:
"it's about creating something WE (!) haven't seen before by which some of US (!) have some creativity to lend." So you and the others want to CREATE something which YOU haven't seen before, by lending YOUR creativity. That means you believe your ideas will actually affect the outcome of this card/clan.
Unless we're speaking a totally different language or you learned English backwards, I'm pretty sure you're contradicting yourself. I could go on all day.