I will try this again next week.
IMO decks like that are actually traps. By relying on solidity and ensuring decent draws every time you also lose the chance of fluctuations and getting an exceptional hand.
A deck setup like that is guaranteed to be 'solid' against most things but will rarely excel. This means that against other top end hands you'll likely be running into old threats and 50/50 situations that will inhibit really goods results in ELO
I recommend a couple of changes
1. Kamekun> Ichiko or Marley if you have her
2a) If you changed to Ichiko up Zhu Tang to Heitachi
2B) If you changed to Marley up Zhu Tang to Heitachi
The reasoning is because La Junta is likely to be out this week so the SOB acts as a pseudo DR
According to probability, a deck with 3 2* will give 2 2* in half its hands and all 3 in 5 hands. While you might get a supposed "Exceptional hand" you most likely end up with several predictable and inflexible hands. My strongly preferred deck builds are...
5, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2
4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2
Any 1 card in a deck will appear in half your hands, but what good are they if backed by weak cards? 3* can and usually win games. 2*? Not so much. They mostly boil down to fillers that might allow for a 'narrow escape'.
how do u put the title of the deck as link?