Its safe to say that fr took a heavy toll on this games population, lots of inactive players, i understand wanting to create another game for their customers, but the timing of it was atrocious
theres been a huge market drop in cards since dt started awarding prizes lyse dropping from 12m to 6m korr 14m to 10m marly halving itself in price, this definitely makes players not want to take a risk on investments since it seems the market isnt going to repair itself.
Why not reduce the amount of prizes given in dt, or just limit who can win the first prize?
from 1-10 = first prize
from 11-30 = 2nd prize
from 31-70 = third prize
from 71-120 = fourth prize
from 121-150 = fifth prize
this just means that players new to the game scoring in the 50's wont win a korr end up trading for a cheap prize and dropping his overall value
and slowly removing the amount of prizes given out to 3 a day, 5 a week, 10 a month.
Staff weekly bans, not like before, where they would ban the cards weeks in advance not knowing what the upcoming elo week would be like, but to actually have staff players play elo that week and ban whatever they beleive would be too common next week allowing for diversity the following week
; ongh free, mono Jungo runs rampant as always, but dont ban ongh that week, instead ban something like Jean, it wont cripple them as its just a staff ban that last a week, and theres plenty of other 2 stars in the clan, it will just give players the push they need not
Actually you should have praised Icarus for keeping this thread alive
Well, I think they need to change the format election so that it actually works:
--> Make the most used 5* and most used 4* of the 10 most used clans up for voting automatically = 20 cards
--> Then make the next 4 most used cards of the 6 most used clans up for voting = 24 cards
--> Cards which were above 5% of votes (banned or unbanned) in the previous week are always in the next election, instead of just banned ones. This stops Uranus running rampant for 2 weeks in a row automatically!
--> If a card receives 15%+ of the vote with a majority to ban, it receives a 2 week ban, and is taken off the format election for the next week, so more votes are freed up for that week. (It comes back during the second week of the ban so it can be voted on again).
Also, advertise the format election more, players will always forget to vote. Try and get 30% of players to vote at least!
See, right now Kinichaw isn't in the format election because she's expensive and players play lower star Huracan more often. But I'm sure that if she were to be in the format election, she would receive 5%+ of the votes.
Temporary bans were good, but a lot of manhours are needed to enforce it, also we need to check every week which cards are banned and all...
Long hair don't care is the char version of who needs ____ when you have swag.
From 1-50 = first prize
from 51-100 = 2nd prize
from 100-110 = third prize
from 111-120 = fourth prize
from 121-150 = fifth prize
^ For a segregation system like that, you'd probably have to make the groupings even. Otherwise the probability of receiving a prize (granted, a lesser value one than the top prizes) would be significantly higher for the narrower bracket ranges.