Montana LD card is weak!

Monday 26/08/2013, 17:07

Does anyone else think that this card is weak? Sharon, another 3* card, has 7/3 3stars, +2 damage, but Bella Ld only has 5/5 3stars revenge:+2 power... revenge makes it harder to use her and i would take Sharon which can be used more often(rather than only as revenge)...

Tuesday 27/08/2013, 04:01

That hand cramping deserves a topic, as it'd easily get more factual responses than anything you'll see from this.

Tuesday 27/08/2013, 08:02

Imo Travis Ld is the worst ld in the game.

Tuesday 27/08/2013, 11:08

Legendary is only a card's rarity. It doesn't say anything about how good they are.

Legendary: Only achievable through missions
Collector: No longer in packs, only available through trading, or prizes
Rare: Least likely to get in packs
Uncommon (Unusual as UR calls it): Less likely to get in packs
Common: Most likely to get in packs

Tuesday 27/08/2013, 12:01

@theKFcguy - At least Travis has a use. Bella Ld and Naja Ld are significantly underpowered in comparison to their counterparts.

LD's weren't designed to be game changers, cards you must include in your deck for every clan. They were designed as a type of collector, a prized possession. Yes the stats for most of the LD's are awful, but they weren't designed to be game changers like Ongh and Beeboy.

Tuesday 27/08/2013, 12:58

Bella Ld and The Huracan ld is the greatest of all :dork:

Tuesday 27/08/2013, 20:48

Well... she's got stable damage compared to Sharon (you'd use Moses nowadays anyways). I'd probably use her for DT and nothing else really but I'd need a lot of 7 damagers. But yeah, she could've been better with revenge: +3 power, or same ability with 1 extra base damage so she could've been like Giovanni with an ability. Definitely poorly designed

Wednesday 28/08/2013, 02:27

In elo bella and naja are more playable than travis.

Wednesday 28/08/2013, 16:13

Well i use Sharon and Moses in my deck, so yea... btw i wasnt here when Bella Ld was created so i dont know the specifics... sigh, oh well...


Reply to this subject