@-Cypher- :
Problem with that idea is that there currently are two different Survivor games going on. There is the ELO version and the Type 2 version. The gameplay between the two of them are different enough that you cannot just equate the two in difficulty, so you would end up paying out twice.

@ON_Ragnarok :
Interesting idea, although that requires a bit more work on coding on the server end. More complexity in the game means more bug-finding and more chances something is going to get screwed up. However, it also will encourage people to challenge the highest level player available on the survivor game (by just rejecting all but the highest survivor) instead of just taking the random challenges. Kinda changes the intent for quick games that promote random pairings for faster play.

Yeah your rigth It would take away all the fun from the game. Maybe it could be changed so that no one could refuse challenges or X challenges in a row .

Why is it that in survivours ELO mode...
it says for player +12 level
while one need to be lvl 15 to play elo

I made a good record today of 6 wins today(pretty good for me)but kate anounced my results in french.the other times she did in english.strange................

I have suggestion, how about creating a new room for the daily tournament : T1 and T2 without randomness factor?

I'm with you, Grapu!!!

I agre with Grapu too - could be better if playing in tournament in no random room I wouldnt mess up my elo score!