offline Gazelle28 Imperator  
Monday 22/01/2007, 04:56

Why dont people put JIM in the Uppers ELO deck?

Hes quite effective against ULU WATU right?


offline -sCapeg0d- Colossus Limit Break
Tuesday 23/01/2007, 13:33

Uppers, Sakrohm and Montana have got a fixed bonus rate (ie. no matter how many pills you use, the bonus is constant) : -X opp attack min Y.

However, in case of the Bangers and the Ulu Watu, it is not so (There exists a simple formula - " number of pills (n) = attack (2n plus 2) " [ note: applicable only when the bonus is triggered ]. In laymans term, " The higher the number of pills you spend, the greater the attack becomes "smiley

What I meant to convey thro' all this is that, use Laetitia if you have a bagers deck/combi or if you are a generous player. Or use Jim if you are a Pill-saver or are using an Uppers deck/combi.

Saddy is good but Laetitia and Jim are better against the Ulu Watus.

offline 0- JP Imperator † OVER KILL †
Wednesday 24/01/2007, 03:41

Well im not sure about that, the Ulu Watu have a strong bonus, (power 2); its a numbers game. I prefer Laetitia over Jim tho, hehe! smileysmiley

offline Morder4Life Senior  
Wednesday 24/01/2007, 14:20

Hmm, Jim is not that useful against the ulu watu clan cause Power power opp doesn't count the bonuses/abilities..

offline Gazelle28 Imperator  
Thursday 25/01/2007, 15:29

Laetitia is cruel tho, haha, power 2 opp = power ensures advantage.smiley

Answer to this subject

Clint City, night.