Come on people im not gona post all 76 cards here just tell me a good deck and il check if i have those cards
Come on, guy, we are not gonne post all possible deck variants....
maybe look at what has already posted in this forum in the last months?
Well this one has served me well...
All Stars 13*
The ones that are vital (for me anyway) are Striker, XU52 & Selsya, the others can be mixed and matched
GHEIST sux in ELO... But if you want to make a gheist elo deck.:
Selsya (lvl 1)
Xu52 (lvl 5)
Methane (lvl 4)
Erika (lvl 4)
but really.... even that's no good
Swap erika....shes a bad card trust me..other cards are good too selsya is good at level 1...its funny sometimes selsya vs jim....jim gets 1 power and selsya gets 4....haha
Thanks ill give those cards a try, and as for DerMagus you useless and watch your mouth
I agree to tupac...the message boards is used to help people and discuss strategies
Magus' answer wasnt a brilliant idea, but Tupac wasn't all nice as well. He gave us a whopping 7 hours to respond before he asked again.
Just calm down.
Yeah... discuss strategies, not asking peple "give me the best deck you know". THAT is contributing nothing. Maybe we have different ideas of what is proper for discussion and strategy boards... a blank "give me xyz" is clearly not my idea of it but seems other people's idea. I, personally, find posts without informational content that ask for something without a very clear point of what one gains from it, as offensive as the OP seems to take my post. So I directly return: Tupac, watch your mouth.
And being called useless... what the hell are posts checked for? I hereby state I feel clearly, directly and personally offended by this.
This applies especially to what I have said: looking down the forums there is this "discussion" again and again. But people do not read any more but rather ask questions again and again and want answers presented to them directly... great culture of "discussion" and this has not even something to do with discussing strategy. Giving deck lists= strategy? I do not think so.
Also, I take the initial lack of answers (which made necessary a second post to which I replied only, not the first one) in a way that I am not the only one who has a "lack of interest" in this kind of threads. Pushing your own thread due to lack of answers should rather send you thinking why you got no answers than making you go "push, give answer, please".
But again, this seems to be a clash of ideas of what is a proper "strategy discussion" or even discussion in general.