Mmm... I'm really not sure these changes would be "balanced"
I understand why those Pussycats
cards are banned: because they are perfect semi-evo cards.
But i actually use 2 of those cards(yayoi and Wanda
) full evolved. Specially, Wanda
is the only one decent SOA that Pussycats
have, and i guess SOA is needed in ELO
. You could say that Pussycats
still are playable in a half deck, but well not everyone wants to play a half deck(i don't want to, at least)
The semi-evo is a problem because players who result benefited with them are the ones who have more money, and that kills completely the strategy part. In my opinion, a better solution would be to ban semievos, or restrict the number of semi-evo cards in the deck.
About All Stars
, i don't think any particular ban of those is exagerated, but the 3 at the same time? Same with gheists, i admit facing Rolph
is one of the things i more hate, but banning the two at the same time? I don't see a really good reason for banning Leviatonn
, the double stops are strategically good, in my opinion, and his power doesn't make him overpowered. But Bristone
is basically THE damage reducer, as well as Spiaghi
. Those two absolutely should not be banned.
Caelus, Sylth, Ghumbo
, even Uranus
, those bans look reasonable. The leaders thing, well i guess it's ok, looks like it could result interesting.
But banning a lot of cards just makes the chose variety poor, and i'm sure that doesn't help to strategic.
Well, it's just my opinion