"
Hawkins hurts, simply because Piranas' remaining 2*s are pretty worthless... now. When the landscape of
ELO is slightly lower powered, cards like
Spycee will probably become more viable options."
Spycee will NEVER be a viable option. Not unless they ban
Tula and
Hawkins Noel.
-
After building quite a few decks in keeping with these new rules, I've grown used to the majority of the bans and I'm looking forward to being able to use
Freaks tainted decks on a more even footing.
Cards such as:
Striker,
Marina, caelus,
Ghumbo,
Charlie,
Toro,
Rolph, and so on... have made other clans much more appealing. I still think they should have added cards to counter these rather than take them away, I guess we can only hope that in the future these cards will be added back when the rest of the clans are up to speed.
Some of the bans are simply, well, stupid.
Hawkins,
Bristone,
Nanook, Noodile,
Yayoi,
Gwen.... these cards dont' strengthen their clans to the point of making other clans seem like lesser choices. They were never an issue and were never why the clans dominated before.
Some of their removals have actually made their clans underpowered with the new rules.
I appreciate what you're trying to do, but this first shot is extremely poorly thought out.
Bangers were one of the most powerful clans and they've remained untouched.
Dorian was removed when
Uppers were already extremely lacking in
Elo. This move is particularly lacking in logic...