As well as allowing you to level up, battle points are also key to the Daily Tournaments as the ranking system is based on the number of battle points won. We have decided to update the way in which these points are calculated by simplifying the system and making it less dependent on the number of stars a deck contains and more dependent on the development and outcome of the fight. You’ll find all the details on this new points calculating system in the rules by clicking here. This change is now in place, including during the DTs.
Dr Bluthgeld "I wonder whether the Government (or the Staff) just only reads our shouts and complaints here. As for changes of the rules, we'll see."
Well said my friend. I want to rant but I'm not going to. However I will say that when such a major change is made is it outrageous to consider having the CUSTOMERS
What I was saying is that a vote from members who have actually spent money on this site would have been nice.
Post 74: very well said sir. that's what i'm about to say. it will be chaos. and 5* will gradually dominate this tounament.
To me, they would remake ALL of card's powers, damages, abilities and bonuses and make two different rooms. One for 16 to 25 stars and other for 35 to 40 stars. That's the only way I see it that the complains are gonna end.
They can't just remake every card, just go back the type 1 and 2 rooms, there was never any problem with it.
If they can change the scoring system at least they should also increase the clintz reward.
500+ clintz and 1 credit from top 11 below is not that good enough you know.
Seems to me the 2 biggest problems with the game so far is "finding evenly matched opponents" and it's been that way since day 1 that I've played, and the other problem is the scoring system. Well, this tries to simplify it, make it more stream lined and easier to deal with. That works from that perspective. But, in reality all that has been done is to change the scale for scoring. Yes it's simpler, but winning and losing just became worth more. I don't see this as a good or final fix. One part in particular has always stood out as bad in the scoring, and was just made worse by this change, is that of the penalty for banned characters. It used to be a minor penalty that was easily overcome and not much of a penalty in all. Now it's a joke entirely. 2 points isn't even worth caring about when you're getting 35-45 (approximation) per game. If it was really intended as a penalty for playing those characters using them would hurt you significantly. Make the penalty for using them equal to thier star rating plus 1. And make it for each character on the list that is in your eight card deck. Then you'd see people being very careful about which ones they used and how many they included because winning could net them less than losing. Now that's a penalty worth paying attention to and abiding by. I'm not convinced that this new system is in any way better than the old one. And I'm not convinced that the old one was better than this one.