offline Azeem- Colossus Harbingers of Ares
Friday 12/10/2012, 19:39

I know majority of the time it's not the deck it's the player , but in certain decks when a couple of cards don't draw their bonus , your screwed. Which makes you think why not switch to Mono. In mono though there are glaring problems in it but you can overcome that with smart play .

So which is better? And what clans would you Half + go Mono with?

offline ghelas Titan E X C A L I B U R
Saturday 13/10/2012, 00:18

I think half-decking is far easier. It's entirely possible to build a deck of 8 cards that are still strong if one of them lacks bonus. With Mono clan, on the other hand, there are only a few possible strategies to pick from. Your opponent has a better chance of guessing how you're going to try to make gap, and that can translate into a significant weakness.

offline KillerYuri Hero  
Saturday 13/10/2012, 01:11

Normally Montana and Rescue should both go mono because they can not live without bonus, the others are fine with half

offline AGPrinz Titan The BeSharps
Saturday 13/10/2012, 19:24

Mono is great, especially with support cards. However, there are alot of overpowered cards to use right now, Jean, Bogdan, Saki, Robb, Asaki dorian... why not half deck with cards like these

offline Azeem- Colossus Harbingers of Ares
Saturday 13/10/2012, 21:31

Look at the next week possible bans , think about it.

Answer to this subject

Clint City, night.