Seen me a coupla wins. Depends on speedy battles more than victories though... Green face?
21:16 Deathmatch you crushed CiscoAlmaLoco, La No Guild (12-0): 351 points
21:14 Deathmatch you beat -Madn3s-, E X C A L I B U R (7-0): 296 points
21:12 Deathmatch you were annihilated by -Madn3s-, E X C A L I B U R (0-12): 216 points
21:11 Deathmatch you lost against -TS-Fa6s, Tequila Sunrise- UR (0-4): 184 points
21:08 Deathmatch you lost against -TS-Fa6s, Tequila Sunrise- UR (0-7): 158 points
21:04 Deathmatch you were annihilated by -TS-Fa6s, Tequila Sunrise- UR (0-11): 135 points
21:01 Deathmatch you crushed -TS-Fa6s, Tequila Sunrise- UR (12-1): 115 points
20:58 Deathmatch you crushed Wampiri, UR CLAN DE MEXICO (12-0): 60 points
Noctezuma = best 5* Huracan even with Revenge
Magistrado Ld = best 3* Huracan even with Confidence
Derby Queen = best 2* Huracan even with Reprisal
Carmen and Valentina Ld = best 3* Sentinel options even with Reprisal and Revenge
You seriously suggesting I lose any of those? They simply cannot be beaten in each of their slots and Hugo or some other Leader is compulsory surely?
Still thanks for the criticism. What would you suggest otherwise?
120>0 in 1 day. Wow people are really split over this Haters gonna hate
No need to get defensive. When the deck yields a 4-4 score in DM, it's just passable. Even the results themselves speak to room for improvement. That's why there are many downvotes along with the upvotes. It isn't "haters" but legitimate constructive criticism.
Why would a Leader be compulsary? You are building your deck too much around a luck based OP draw of Noctezuma + Hugo. Get rid of Hugo and the issue of which cards are the "best" in their star count slots won't be an issue because you can take on some 4*s with Hugo gone; giving you deck a higher chance of being consistently good regardless of which 4 you draw..