Ever used 4/3/1???... VERY versatile deck

Tuesday 02/04/2013, 11:40


change dagg to X-0DUS in 1300+ battles (dont do this)

Tuesday 02/04/2013, 13:04

I'm skeptical honestly, but that can't be avoided. I don't see how the Sentinel 3/8 is necessary, you could run 6 Vortex, include X-0DUS, and just splash Chiara and Redra if you need a DR and Chiara.

Tuesday 02/04/2013, 13:51

This deck is not very good.

The first thing I would do, is bubblgm and Ward hg to Cyb Lhia and C Beast.

The 3-1-4 is not necessary. A good solution to that, is to change Chiara Cr into Flinch (This week is a Roots week)

X-0 can be used instead of Dagg/T Gaank

Tuesday 02/04/2013, 14:07

I get what you mean, but this deck is built around Jakson and g-taank (their good with damage).

I was gonna use another 3* Sentinel but theres nothing as solid as chiaara cr.

Just give your honest opinion, all welcome to rate up or down

Tuesday 02/04/2013, 15:27

The concept of 4-3-1 can be good or bad, I don't think many people have tried it to prove whether it's good or not. You do risk not getting the bonuses in this set-up but you get a better pool of playable strong cards.

Some cards in the deck can be changed such as Ward hg and Bublgmm to Cyb Lhia and C Wing, for example. But aside from the choice of cards I'd also choose the Sentinels to be the 4-card clan as their bonus (in my opinion, not based on facts) is more needed than Vortex bonus.

But at the end it's down to personal choice. If you can get a good 1400+ Elo score with that, then you'll prove that this deck does work after all.


Reply to this subject