@flippadeck,
Skeelz came after
Pussycats... You're not fooling anybody. If you're going to debate, get the facts straight. For proof, the only cr in
Skeelz is caelus. Not only that, but caelus was TURNED cr, not starting. Cards used to start out cr, but then they changed it to give the game some oomph.
The reason
Berzerk and
Vortex got one before is because they are newer clans.
Skeelz is somewhat new... But they still have reasonable amount of cards for a clan, but
Vortex and
Berzerk had slightly lower than them. Giving them a new card can increase this. This is the same reason why the berzerks got 2 missions when new missions came out, rather than 1.
@canopusHOA, i know, i said aside from
Snowflake. It was in response to somebody who said that
Snowflake was the clans only good card within a long time. Also, you may say that
Belgosi and
Jay are better than
Carter. Well,
Jay is typically unreachable, and
Belgosi is strong, but that 6 damage threatens well with 4 damage cards(which is abundant within
Skeelz).
Carter isn't most peoples first pick, but he may be their most conveinient option(plus
Jay conflicts chiara's ability).
Your offensive comment on requiring help from flippadeck is rather... Offensive. Face it one way or anoter,
Carter has uses. But i will say that i have never once used him in a deck... But i will to do his mission. I did not say
Lorna would always be second best. Lets go back to beginning, lets assume that
Jay is in the deck. Since revenge doesn't work well with other revnge and confidence, that means that chiara,
Cley,
Drake, and
Deebler will be out of question. This leaves us with really only 4, whom are
Snowflake,
Sandro,
Lorna, and
Praxie. If
Greem is in there, maybe you don't want
Snowflake(although amazingly useful one you get it in, its hard to do). Then we are left with 3.
Sandro requires mono. In half, his usefulness is debateble. Still 7/4 with himself, and 8/4 with partner, but
Praxie and
Lorna i would say are better. Now lets assume
Jay took out a big chunk of your clintz,
Praxie is unaffordable. Therefore, we are supposed to go with
Lorna.
This is what i was getting at. The whole process of finding a 3* that works. Is it really situational?
Greem and
Jay can work well with 4 damage cards, plus
Redra only makes 13*'s, very applicable to common day
elo decks. Would i say this would never happen? Tough call, seeing as most people who could afford
Jay could afford
Praxie, and most would even take chiara in the deck in the first place, but i could see people considering it to happen.
At least understand arguements before you try to apply an oppinion.
Also @ flippadeck, does anybody even use
Drake anymore(not exactly proving my points more than yours), but
Lorna is the least situational in the clan.
Jay can provide great tactics in halfdeck with cards like
Sharon,
Bella Ld, and that other
Montana with 6/4 -2 opp life min 2, so i can see him in a halfdeck. This eliminates pretty much all 3*'s except for 3...
Lorna being one of them. As far as
Danae goes, im taking my bets with
Lorna. That 4 damage is soooooo much more useful than 3.
Lorna is least situational(aside from
Praxie, where
Praxie is pretty much only less useful against
Lola,
Kusuri,
Melanie, and... Actually i think thats it...), where against
Nightmare/
Piranas, still a 7/4. Not to mention the clan revolves around abilities. Against
Skeelz, well they might have the same problem...
And to both of you, i never once in the beginning said
Carter was better than all their 4*'s(although i would take him over
Corvus... 3 damage is too low for a 4*), i just said he was a reasonably addition. Would i say
Greem and
Jay(even
Belgosi) was a better addition? By a huge gap! Most of what i have been saying is situational, but the points are made and still reasonable. I respect both of you guys, but this confusion about twisted words is really annoying(by twisted words what do i mean? About
Carter being really good, and
Lorna always being 2nd best 3*.