Montana vs. Uppers
-12 opp attack, min 8 vs. -10 op attack, min 3
Montana bonus PRO and CON:
Greatly Reduces attack of cards.
*Good against High Powered Cards with a lot of used pillz.
Won't realy affect Low attack / low powered cards. HIGH MINIMUM ATTACK.
Uppers bonus PRO and CON:
Greaty Reduces attack of Low attack / Power cards and HIgh Attack / Power cards. LOW MINIMUM ATTACK.
*Good for both High / Low Power / Attack cards.
Montana Bonus Reduces more....
VERDICT: you decide.
Uppers vs. Sakrohm
-10 opp attack min 3 vs. -8 pp attack min 3
Sakrohm bonus PRO and CON:
Same as Uppers
*Same as Uppers
Uppers has higher attack redux.
VERDICT: you decide.
pls. post your own clan comparison here.
I add another PRO to Uppers:
Great for OLD / No Pillz play.
Round 1: Uppers win....they have zatman..jackie..etc........uppers will win
round2: sakrohm will win.....not only sarkrohm hav good bonus..but great cards..like venus..or the 2 squid guy..skrumxxt or something....its ability have -5 opp damamge min 1!!
You cannot consider clans on bonus alone.
Montana have rather low powered characters, mostly 5's and 6's... So their bonus is never really appreciated.
Uppers have many cards with high power and a great attack reducing bonus
Sakrohm have a few high power cards and a lesser attack reducing bonus, but they have some very strong damage reducing cards...
Uppers > Sakrohm > Montana
I'll understand your point, but i'm gonna talk about Bangers and Ulu Watu
Same bonus for them, but with some differences. Ulu Watu cards have higher power, but less damage (except Tanaereva)
Bangers have more damage and less power, but they have a lot of cards with good abilities like Saddy, Graf, Vermyn N and even Juicy Lord. I consider Bodenpower equal to Hikiyousan
I did not see many people using Bangers, i think they prefer Ulu Watu only for is higher power
(i'm talking only about ELO)
I agree on that people prefer Ulu Watu for thier higher power.
Here Ulu Watu shines both Gabrielle and Jeff are better to be used than Graff.
Nanook vs Juicy Lord. I'll go with Nanook the possible 10 power is better than a chance to reduced damage by 2.
Saddy against Rass close fight only a point of damage makes a difference.
Gaia she wins here no question
Without Wee Lee Ulu Watu have a big lost while Bangers have both Laetitia and Vermyn but Vermyn is better played as a 3-star and as a filler.
Both Hiko and Boden do good damage and has nice power but again Bangers just doesn't have the support from thier lower tier unlike the Ulu Watu.
FangPi and Junta
FangPi has better damage and one-hit KO plus the Soleil cards really gave them a huge boost. Marlysa, Elya and Kero put power in them.
Junta has good commons and uncommons but they are currently outclass by Fangpi they need help quick
Gheist and Roots
Gheist has high damage but all thier good cards are level 4 or 5 except for Ericka. The only good low level for them is Selesya
Roots underated they are usuable because of thier high power but they just don't have the killer instinct for thier damage pales compare to other clan. Need to have new guys ASAP.
Same happens between La Junta and Fang Pi Clan, High Power and Damage versus good abilities.
By the way, a pill-less GraksmxxT is a great opponent it can either block your damage or deal 5 point thanks to its bonus and
ulu have 3 8 power cards (2 usable in elo) and bangers have none
Right,ulu watu owned power BUT NOT DAMAGE
so if i were to use sakrohm or pussycats against ulu watu,im sure i will win
I agree with you, Sven
I have two deck for ELO, one of them is Ulu Watu/ Uppers and the other is Bangers/Uppers
The deck with Bangers have difficult to deal with clans like All Stars and Uppers, but i never had difficult with Sakrohm or Pussycats. And this is the opposite with the Ulu Watu. "Easy" against All Star, Uppers, but fall in damage reduction