Do you know any cards here that looks weak on paper, but are actually pretty good/great?
for me, Petra is the 1 card that looks weak on paper but are good . i mean 7/5 for a 4*? looks pretty weak. but the truth is that her sob shuts down annoying attack manipulation clans, and then puts the opponents down to 1 pill less most of the time
Lothar (of the Hill People) has won me *so* *many* *games* that I've lost count.
And each and every time he clobbers somebody, I'm singing "Loooooow-THAR, of the HILL PE-ople!" at my keyboard.
Each and every time.
he is so underrated...he..he.. its just unfair...
Oh and sliman
whats up with everyone putting mona at 20k and 30k and sliman who has also a perfect ability for a pill-manipulating clan has never surpassed 800 clintz?????
Mona is pretty much the best 3* in Montana while Piranas have a lot of really good 5* to choose from. Also Sliman is a common card. Doesn't mean Sliman is bad, he goes well with all the 4 damage cards that Piranas have.
Thawinner012: sliman has 5 power and minimum 5 for a 5* and is a common in a clan with a lot of 5*s.
Mona is a 6 power 3* with a minimum 4, uncommon in a clan where she is one of the best 3*s.
How about ralph, radek, dolly, elke, wesley, laura, lergh, or ella
Elke is useless... -1 Pillz is not that big of a threat, and 2 damage won't scare anyone.
Elke has 3 Dmg, And thats the point of this thread right?
She looks useless, but in reality shes not so bad
Elke is not useless, she can mess up the opponent strategy, and if use on attack, will make the opponent underpill. I've fought many people that turn defensive when I threw her out and messed their pill count. Especially those who open their fight by heavy pilling, making it easier for me to predict what they'll do.