Better Version Of Winning At 16
Modified the previous deck, following the suggestion of a guildmate.
16* is no no, 25*- 31* is go go.
Nice deck. Though you might have trouble finding opponents in you catagory sometimes.
You know, Battery, lots of people have talked to me about that problem, but I've never suffered from opponent shortage in the first tier.
I haven't actually played much low * DTs since the update so im not completely sure if there is a problem, i just pass on what other people say lol.
The secret is blah blah blah. there's a better set of half uppers. try to figure it out. the montana half deck is perfect.
No. You have very little chance to ever get the KO bonus. You are actually going to get a lower bonus for star count then if you played a 26* star deck in the second room. You will face significantly less newbs, crushing newbs is always important to winning DTs. During non-peak hours you will have trouble finding and opponent.
Raptor WMD - Thank you for the feedback. I have several questions to ask you:
Q1: "You are actually going to get a lower bonus for star count than if you played a 26 star deck in the second room."
Why is that? The bonus is of one point per star difference, with a maximum of a five points bonus - why does that mean that I would be getting a lower bonus?
Q2: "You will face significantly less newbs."
Good sir, I have to say that that statement makes it obvious that you have never played a D.T. at sixteen stars since the tier change, because two out of every three players you face are under level twenty with characters that are not fully levelled. What ground do you have to make that statement?
Q3: "During non-peak hours you will have trouble finding an opponent."
I refer you to my second question.