Sorry, computer glitch and I accidentally closed the subject of the last thread I made. I just wanted to ask a couple more things about my deck. From everybody's advice, a good revised deck from my current deck (" target="_blank">http://www.urban-rivals.com/en/presets/?id_preset=251234 would be:
Felicia or Nanook 3*
But I also wanted to ask, which 3* card is better in your opinion, Nanook or Felicia?
I've seen a lot of people say Nanook is a lot better than Felicia, but I don't really get how. Felicia is a possible 9/3 card, but while Nanook is a 10/4, she's more vulnerable since she doesn't have that bonus blocking ability.
And a lot of people say that I should replace Warren, but he really doesn't seem that bad to me. I'd say he's one of the best 2* Ulu Watu cards I've seen. He does well against most cards, unless they get a lot of their power from abilities or bonuses.
Sorry, failed at posting my deck :/
People are just stupid, gets mesmerized but high stats. I would say they are about the same, but eugene beats them both. also, oraya/stanly to numar, and then warren (wtf) to ice jim I really like soa but if you dont like his bad stats use felicia then.
but overall mono ulu does not go well, damage output too low (especially faced against SoA)