53 messages
In DM.
That means, which cards are the least threatening at all points of the game, where your opponent will play fast?
1 power cards with no help preferred.
That means, which cards are the least threatening at all points of the game, where your opponent will play fast?
1 power cards with no help preferred.
31/53
I don't know but I find tham funny: but I never get a full dm
32/53
50 itty bitty clintz isn't bad money for in betweenz tournaments.
Survivor stresses me out too much. I think I make more in DM, if you count how fast T2 matches go.
Survivor stresses me out too much. I think I make more in DM, if you count how fast T2 matches go.
33/53
@traxxxion: same here , whats the purpose of leveling anyway? that is when you are level 50
34/53
Not to mention the ridiculous rule of lower beats a higher level= more points
I ridiculed Fraggle's perception on that but he hasn't replied
I ridiculed Fraggle's perception on that but he hasn't replied
35/53
Hey if we beat a player twice we get -5 points if he beats us he gets +points for revenge ...????
36/53
Of course: if you are a low level with bad cards you should be worth less points if one opponent keept beating you.
37/53
@drakenkanon
Many so-called "noobs" tend to have better cards than you. I imagine when you're past level 40-50 or so when most players are below your level, that you'll suffer penalties every game when realistically level 25+ people have all the capacity to build a deck as good as yours (I'd argue level 20+, but some people don't play DT or ELO...) unless you have any of the Big Five, which is such a minority of the players that it shouldn't affect everybody.
The only way this could help is for "true" noobs who are low levels and are playing with terrible decks. However, they should stay in the level-restricted (like safe neighborhood) rooms instead of going somewhere else to reap benefit of their inexperience in the game. Going head-to-head in a real, fair match against other people with similar skill levels would help noobs more, IMO. There is a reason why noobs don't get 50 extra points for beating higher-levels in ELO, so why shouldn't that apply to DMs too?
Many so-called "noobs" tend to have better cards than you. I imagine when you're past level 40-50 or so when most players are below your level, that you'll suffer penalties every game when realistically level 25+ people have all the capacity to build a deck as good as yours (I'd argue level 20+, but some people don't play DT or ELO...) unless you have any of the Big Five, which is such a minority of the players that it shouldn't affect everybody.
The only way this could help is for "true" noobs who are low levels and are playing with terrible decks. However, they should stay in the level-restricted (like safe neighborhood) rooms instead of going somewhere else to reap benefit of their inexperience in the game. Going head-to-head in a real, fair match against other people with similar skill levels would help noobs more, IMO. There is a reason why noobs don't get 50 extra points for beating higher-levels in ELO, so why shouldn't that apply to DMs too?
38/53
39/53
40/53
Facemuffin - Senior - Tuesday 29/06/2010, 21:46
lol spagr
lol spagr
The Urban Rivals team is made by lovers of all kind of Collectibles Cards Games and Trading Cards Games like: Magic the Gathering, Dominion, Vampire, Yu-Gi-Oh!, Pokemon, Wakfu TCG, Assassin Creed Recollection, Shadow Era, Kard Kombat and Might & Magic Duel of Champions.