Now that I have had time to cool off, I would like to readress my issues with the new
ELO bans. First and foremost,
Wanda should be back in the new
ELO, (should never have left)
Charlie.....don't care, she see play but not all that much in IMO.
Yayoi, was not overpowered in th clan she was in, she was the only thing that gave
Pussycats a chance, she is a 7/6 SoA with a clan bonus of damage reduction, how many other cards are similar to
Yayoi that aren't banned and are in better clans...a lot. Brian, Quibik,
Bogdan, etc. all similar cards yet not banned, I know it was a knee jerk reaction because of bringing
Charlie and
Wanda back, but the big issue players have, is that you
ELO ban a good card and don't offer up a replacement for awhile. If you gave us 7/5 for the same stars and clan sooner, losing
Yayoi wouldn't be a big deal. That's why there is an uproar for
Gil and
Uranus, I don't a majority of people realize these cards are probably a little too powerful for
ELO, but.....where is the replacement? Give us
Uranus clone but -4 damage min 2, give us a
Yayoi clone 7/5 SoA, give us a
Gil replacment -3 pillz min 6 or something. As for
Sigma, well I can see why you banned her, but....you never gave the players a chance to see if she was worthy of a ban. That I find is what irks me the most. Sure you can do play testing, but not in the numbers we players can, you should have allowed
Sigma in the new
ELO for at least 2 weeks so you could have seen how she would have affe