20:49 Elo you crushed chabone, The Super-Elite Newbie Guild (12-0): 1310 ELO
20:46 Elo you beat alb1975_DL, Dragonlance (8-0): 1294 ELO
20:41 Elo you narrowly escaped from BstialDemonIB, IMPERIAL BLOOD (4-3): 1277 ELO
20:36 Elo you won by forfeit against dozeyd123, Revival (8-7): 1263 ELO
I want think a new elo's mode, a new rooms type for player have a real life but are very good player with no more time for play, a new type called "Raulken" for player have max 3-4hours of play at week
My idea is:
1) limited match (for example 50)
2) match's rules:
a. system automatic select ur opponent with a historical % win on last 100match in this modality (isnt possible match u have 1400 play vs a 1300 player advanced, because system is based on hystory and not actual level )
b. on start U are vs low %win level, after U are vs high level % EVEN, whit this system U can simulate a eliminator tournament
a. delta of %win from U and ur opponent! for a real grade of match and not fake elo's REMEMBER ELO's SYSTEM IS REALY CREATED for a LIMITED MATCH, not for urban rivals
b. delta stars match
LIVE or DIE
I am available for any suggested, critique or other... this is a beautiful game but elo is not good!
It's time of revolution
Recently i have heard that people can put 1 star character as a filler, such as Wanda 1 star, but doesn't this imply that you have to constantly buy the character again and again because the character will eventually evolve?
Or is there a simple way to lock the experience?
Maybe clans those clans doesn't match right. Maybe card choice is wrong. I don't know please comment.
Here are the facts:
1 - I perform well against strong opponent in dangerous zone (even with ELO ban cards) as i can attack or play poison/life gain (77% win / 23% loss)
2 - ELO is terrible, either i'm unlucky or just unskilled, or the deck is bad (perhaps alltogether). (50% win / 50% loss)
Obviously those who pay win ELO battle no matter what. my characters in ELO always seem to loose in critical battles even though my characters have 15 - 20 pts higher than opponent. I mean seriously. WTF is wrong with Montanas if -12 points deduction in atk and higher atk still causes them to lose.
2. Also, are Piranas good in ELO? I have changed clans many times before... from Sentinel, to Rescue, to GHEIST, to Nightmare, to Jungo, to Uppers, now this... yeah I change a lot
I don't mind investing in another clan... Skeelz look alright, but they are quite expensive and from what I understand, they aren't great in ELO.
3. Finally, just out of curiosity, are Montana good at Type 1 for beginners (by beginners I mean people with a budget of 5k)? From what I understand they're better at Type 2. If possible, could you suggest a Montana type 1 beginner sample deck for around 5k?
Yeah, I have a few questions... could you please answer all of them?
My decks suck. They never get many elo points. My current deck has got me to 920!! The link is in my bio.
Anyway, need help building a deck with those cards, i also have 2 other copies of Deebler (i only have these cards and 1000 clintz). So, is anyone wlling to help me out?
Really just wanted to know if this is a good idea or if there are any cards I should replace for better ones. Note: Clintz is of some concern any these cards are currently pretty cheap so they work for me. And Azel may be seen as a odd choice but I figure she could be good to inflict the slow drain.
So either way- Any suggestions? (oh and this is for ELO, or DT T1)
My first deck that has used Uppers, ever.
I thought that the strong Uppers bonus of -10 opp. attack min. 8 went really well with cards like chiara and Sasha.
So, i made this deck
Please r+c this deck and if you have time, some of my others too Thanks
The Urban Rivals team is made by lovers of all kind of Collectibles Cards Games and Trading Cards Games like: Magic the Gathering, Dominion, Vampire, Yu-Gi-Oh!, Pokemon, Wakfu TCG, Assassin Creed Recollection, Shadow Era, Kard Kombat and Might & Magic Duel of Champions.