In the upcoming weeks Zero Dead and Phyllis are going to be staff banned. What the hell makes them overpowered? Zero is weak against SoA bonuses and Phyllis has 4 min which makes her useless towards the end. And unlike the understandably banned virtual 2* 7/4's (Jessie, Hawkins*, Gil*) their base damage is ONE. meaning without Zero's ability or when Phyllis' gets to her minimum, they only get through with one damage point. Zero Dead seems to be a victim of the desperate (and stupid) attempts to eradicate GHEIST from elo but Phyllis is a whole new line of stupid.
*pill manip is as good as damage.
So I played ELO for the first time yesterday and my score fluctuated between 941 and 1091 and i ended the night at 1062. the next day, today, i did a daily tournament in elo but my score didn't change at all which i thought was weird but i ignored it. After the tournament i played a few more games to try and move my score but it stayed at 1062. I lost 4 battles and won 2 but there was no score change at all. and even at the end of a game is showed no addition or subtraction. could someone please explain. I don't know if my game is messed up or this is something that has to do with taking in the scores, or maybe my game is being laggy. please help
I've started to really hate the amount of people using Montana mono's, Montana/Uppers and to a somewhat lesser extent Uppers mono.
They might be overpowered bonuses but it gets really boring when you find your playing against Montana in Elo EVERY other game. Whats more is that the UR community and mods seem really reluctant to ban many of the top Montana cards for Elo but fine to nerf other clans.
The only Elo banned Montana cards now are the two Cr's. I mean why on earth should say Bristone be banned when Mona, a vastly superior 3* in my opinion (and I'd say most people's) is hardly ever banned.
Hell I'd also say the same for Spiaghi. When you see people using him in other clan's mono or split decks thats gotta be a sign that he should be Elo banned
I'ts been going on since when I first started UR and I hope it will change at some point like Rescue did. Although because its such a powerfull clan, many people use it and invest in the cards so are therefore unlikely to want the best cards out of Elo - a vicious circle
Your welcome to disagree with me if you want but don't put unusefull comments down like "my Montana deck will pwn you in Elo everytime so what you gonna do about it?"
I took Montana as the example because going on about Uppers as well would have gotten too long and boring.
Well, I'm fairly new so sorry if this has been posted before but I read in the elo rules that the highest attack ALWAYS wins. I have played slot of elo this week and quite a few of my games I have lost when I had more attack which made me lose the game. So I'm just wondering why this is. I'm played on a iPhone if that makes a differece.
This deck is balanced one. We have a lot of High-power cards, one Powerful DR, one-woman-army Tula, and two great - lifer that pretty good against DR-s ^.^ And it has great abillity protection, SoB of Piranias, and PrA of Skellz works great against Roots, are GHEIST. AND is cheap. 30.000 is not sow much? Yup?
Copper remains on the banlist, with Havok and Lehane joining him. SoA pretty hard hit, but definitely still playable, says a lot about the strength of GHEIST and Roots. Yookie's available, so look to see more Roots this week. Rescue still cut down with Sledg, Elvira, Kerry out. Hawkins is on a 2 week ban streak.
Biggest surprise would have to be our first Vortex ban (iirc), Dagg has been player banned, we'll see if that changes anything.
Nothing much else, still the same couple of big cards being banned.
The Urban Rivals team is made by lovers of all kind of Collectibles Cards Games and Trading Cards Games like: Magic the Gathering, Dominion, Vampire, Yu-Gi-Oh!, Pokemon, Wakfu TCG, Assassin Creed Recollection, Shadow Era, Kard Kombat and Might & Magic Duel of Champions.