Anti-Soa ELO Freaks/Sak

I haven't played it yet, but it looks good. If I don't come across a lot of SoA, I'll switch Nata to Murray.

What do you think of it?
http://www.urban-rivals.com/en/presets/?id_preset=2583408

Http://cache.gyazo.com/4aa5edb46716f35af5bafe79ababa450.png
I'm thinking of putting Lorna in it but then I have doubts of it and also Skeelz has some pretty sick 3* which makes it hard to decide who to put it anyway.

Hey guys, I made this ELO Deck for Pussycats. Any ways I can improve on it?

http://www.urban-rivals.com/en/presets/?id_preset=2580959

deleted rate and comment

http://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=2578766&list is the counter I made......

Help plz.

Hi guys, this is my 2nd subject about Skeelz..
Well, are they really getting left behind? Maybe it's just me though, I never go past 1300 ELO using Skeelz, the best ELO rrcord that I made was 1352, and the clan that I used is Roots. But Roots wasn't fun for me to play, that's why I decided changing clans, and i got myself into using Skeelz. Skeelz was the clan I enjoyed the most because of their unique abilities. But when I already played ELO using Skeelz, i'm having a hard time on most power manip clans (not most of the time though and not with Frozn), Montana (Avola, who has high dmg, Spiaghi, who helps Avola along the way, Moses, who goes, and Uppers,

deleted

Any suggestion?

I was wondering if anyone could check out my mono freak elo deck and give tell me what you think.

Mercury [1413 Elo]

Made it to top 100, but somehow I felt a weakness against SoA Clans. Any suggestions on that, or just any improvements in general? Feel free to comment, and also rate the deck! Thanks very much everyone.

http://www.urban-rivals.com/en/presets/?id_preset=2582375

Thoughts anyone?
Thanks!

Now Some clans are not as strong as they were, like pirana,Sentinel,Rescue; and there are some banned characters of those clan which may not be necessary now,(like Smokey, Lea, Hawk ), and there might be more

I suggest UNBAN some characters and elo might be more fun, instead of repeatly sell new cards and bury old ones, there are some cards can play in ELO now, and really miss them.

Here are the cards in it

Uranus 4
Na Boh 2
Aleister 2
Miss Stella 5

jungos
Pegh 2
Niva 4
Nyema 3
Buba 4

Thank you plz leave a sudgestions Love y'all

I have played casually for a little while, and I decided that I want to get into the ELO mode.

I was just woundering if it is better to spend a large chunck of my clintz on 1 card, and build a deck around that with what I can, or if I should spend my money equally among all the cards in the deck..
Ex. 1 card worth 20k+ clintz, with 7 cards equal to or less than 5k clintz.. Or build an 8 card deck equal to 25k+ clintz.

I cant decided how I should approch this, so I figured I would ask, any respons is appreciated..

I think they should reduce that time limit in ELO mode, well, seriously, people don't need 2 mins. to think and it's really getting annoying when ur just about to finish them off.. some people spend at least 3/4 of the time limit. I mean seriously? 7 mins. a game?

Well, I was just curious, cus' I never put three of them in a deck.

Dat deck thooo
http://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=2580062

I just got the new fang ld card, and I wanted to try to make a ELO deck with it. I wanted to use Jungo, but of course with most of the great 5*s being banned this week I had to try something new. Let me know what you think, and if if you have any suggestions feel free to offer them. I would be open to switching the Jungo half deck to another clan in order to make it better.

http://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=2580157&list

Thanks guys!

As most of you know, it is not uncommon to see multi-accounts in ELO. you see these level 17s topping 1470 with cards like Kerozinn Cr, and nothing is ever done about it, at least before the tournament ends. Clearly, players with the time and skill level to use two or more accounts to top 100 will do so without discretion, and knock other players off the list too.

Take for example, this ********. His account was created on: April 18th! To think a player with no stars (therefore has never purchased credits) has a full ELO Uppers deck is unfathomable, especially since his battle points indicate he could not have made that much clintz. From this, we can safely hypothesize that it is a multi-account. No proof? Moderators can always trace the IP, my suspicion is UNOWEN, since they both run the same deck and apparently speak French, but a guess is a guess. (I beat this guy btw, before someone says I'm whining about a loss:   00:07 Elo you won by forfeit against mandanga55 (8-6): 1348 ELO)

UR really should put a more sophisticated system in place for smurfs. The current method of reporting is slow, and usually ineffective. It's easy enough to trace and find out by comparing IPs and trade history, as a few of the moderators I know have pointed out. Hopefully something gets done.

edited by UM_AaaBattery Monday 22/04, 10:06