2DT!
All due respect to the creator of this deck All-GioYNWA

Well, that being said, I would like to ask what 3star would be the best in using this deck:

1. Cley
2. Randy
3. Kreenk Ld

Other life manipulators such as Zeke and Sunder cant K.O., which is the main strategy with this deck.
With Cley I got 385 points, and ended up 9th place (my best so far )

Post here decks that have gotten you top 10, including the amount of times, what place and what room you fought in. It doesn't have to be yours, but you must include proof of reaching the top 10 in a screenshot at the end of DT.

http://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=1657546

Money WINS!

Power of cats!

Selina is there.

Even though i always get more attack than the other player... they laways beat my guys!!! and its never happened to me!!!!

Hello Guys, it is me again, and i have a question about which kind of deck gets you more points in DTs. I have a preset (tiny cuts) that got me to 9th place.

SAKROHM UPPERS TINY CUTS DECK" target="_blank">http://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_SAKROHM UPPERS TINY CUTS DECK

For those who do not want to check it out (or too lazy tto), its format is 33322-33322
Now I honestly dont know if the 55443322 deck format is better, so for those people who know, thanks for your help

deleted
T2
26*

Alec Cr can be swapped for another 4 / 5* if you dont want the pesky 2pt penalty every time you draw him, however for the amount of macthes he can win you, i think its a price worth paying..
this deck got me 11th place and im sure somebody out there will be able to go higher with it.
Please rate and comment. thanks.

Thanks Mods

Even when I play a tournament and win every single match I dont get to the top. How does one get higher points so that they can make it to the top tier in the tournaments? Is there some sort of bonus for, say, using few pillz or defeating people at higher levels than yourself?

Write the best name of the post that you reckon was the best ever posted in this section and why for me it was the THIS IS DEFINITLEY THE WORST DECK THAT THIS GAME HAS EVER SEEN! post because it was funny

DT POWER!
Comment and rate please

deleted

I hit 300 battle points, and won the majority of my battles. What should I do next time to place higher?

deleted

Watcha reckon for T1?

deleted&list

evaluate plz

Tiny Cuts at the Police Rave
My take on a tiny cuts deck for DTs. I am looking for advice on how to improve it.

Hi all. I was hoping to get everyone's opinion about something... I've been slowly working my way through the clans, testing out different ones to see which are my favorites. I have had enormous success with every one I've "tested" so far (Uppers, Rescue, Pussycats, All Stars, and Freaks), but inspired by the release of the first Leader card, I decided to take the Nightmare out for a spin.

Frankly, I have almost come to the conclusion that the Nightmare are now fundamentally worthless. Between the relatively mediocre card attack values, the highly conditional abilities that are easily blocked, and the release of clans that are MUCH more effective in terms of attack, damage, abilities, and clan bonuses, I have found it almost impossible to win with a Nighmare/Ambre deck.

This is the makeup of my deck:

Ambre
Kolos
Erzsebet
Glorg
Kenny
Mawpin
Nerfeniti
Oshitune
Pan

I thought that this would be an effective deck, but between the other clans and the "flailers" (opponents who play very oddly - I lost one match against someone who pilled up Kenny in the first round, gained ten life points, and then sat back as I flailed against him, unable to do enough damage to win) I have dropped from an average win/loss ratio of 4/5 to a pathetic 1/10. (I just played twenty games in the last hour, and lost 19 with a single draw.) Am I wrong in thinking that the Nightmare clan are now fundamentally worthless? Or am I just playing them wrong? Opinions highly welcomed.

Heres the preset, and look at my other presets too!
Vortex T1 [2.0]
rate comment and as always, read the description!

I just finished my first event and i'm a little frustrated that the awarding of prizes was a failure. why? because i need to have 50% yes votes in order to award the jackpot. that is all well and good if the participants are good sports. but most losers are not and will do anything to block the winners from getting the prizes. of course if you are a loser in the event, you will not vote. only those who get something were voting yes in my event.

i suggest the following:

voting should be before event starts. event creator will put in the prize rules and have everyone vote. if everyone agrees, event will start. the event cannot start until everyone agrees with the prize rules. then when creator closes event, prizes would just be automatically be distributed. that way, no one can say they are being treated unfairly because they agreed with the rules from the start. and no one can frustrate the winners from getting the prizes they deserved.

my event would've been very successful if not for that prize awarding failure. what was i suppose to say to the winners that they can't get the prizes i promised? that the other particpants were being jackasses?