40enWed, 04 Oct 2006 16:41:35 GMTWed, 04 Oct 2006 16:41:35 GMTSun, 01 Oct 2006 21:18:31 GMTMon, 25 Sep 2006 13:07:52 GMTMon, 25 Sep 2006 13:07:32 GMTSat, 23 Sep 2006 08:46:12 GMTSat, 12 Aug 2006 15:54:53 GMTSat, 12 Aug 2006 04:43:36 GMT
Simple, Right?
]]>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:43:16 GMTFri, 11 Aug 2006 12:37:14 GMTWed, 02 Aug 2006 09:08:53 GMTWed, 02 Aug 2006 07:58:08 GMT
What happens is the "bait" person usually someone higher level, just sits around and fails to answer challenges. This holds up other people who are in the tournament, because they're on a timer waiting for their challenge to be answered. I would assume there's more to this scheme, since that alone accomplishes little. What I would guess is happening is that these "bait" people only answer one or two people's challenge, and purposely lose to them gaining their guildmates and friends, major points.

Now certainly the newly installed system has made some leaps and strides towards making the tournaments more fair. I've already seen improvements in todays tournaments. But nailing the idlers and people failing to answer challenge will put the final nails in the coffin of the cheaters who would have to go through elaborate means just to ensue that they can cheat their way to winning. Sure someone will find a way, but it makes it a lot harder.]]>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 04:12:23 GMT Second, the info when -receiving- challenges will be added soon.
Third, not answering challenge will not be "the new way to beat the system" as it is really not useful to be in a game just to
"not answer challenges" (and you cannot send a challenge if you haven't answered a waiting one).
And last but not least, as already said, in ELO, if someone let the game timeout, he will be -punish- at the end of the day
(severly). (and the ratio of "timed out" games in elo vs "correct" games in quite fine)

You have to understand that it is NOT possible to avoid all the problems if some people just don't want to play fair.
For example, some people dont "let the game timeout" as a strategy but simply quit because they don't like to lose, over time
they will become orange, then red, and nobody will want to play with them.. maybe they will learn

With over 600 players connected at time, I'm sure you'll be able to find the right peoples. ]]>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 23:49:22 GMT
The best will be to have this smile beside chalenge offer too

Plus now what happened to me. I was chlanged by one I accept battle but he do not played and in the batle I was chalanged by someone else.]]>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:04:06 GMTTue, 01 Aug 2006 19:56:34 GMTTue, 01 Aug 2006 17:22:03 GMTTue, 01 Aug 2006 15:39:42 GMT
Love the idea, but it only seems useful when you are the person doing the challanging.]]>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:52:58 GMTTue, 01 Aug 2006 14:49:38 GMTTue, 01 Aug 2006 14:45:01 GMT