40enSun, 13 Jun 2010 20:48:03 GMTSun, 13 Jun 2010 20:48:03 GMTSun, 13 Jun 2010 13:46:29 GMTHugo over Ambre. Other than that, Nice
]]>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 06:16:58 GMTAmbre use Hugo. He will make a 18 atack difference without having to spend a single pill and that effect will be usefull for all your cards. Ambre is for me to ensure the wining of a round with some strategic cards mostly used in deck with high damage output cards.]]>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:33:49 GMThttp://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=1123468]]>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:27:00 GMTHugo banned so don't really want to have less points would I?]]>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 04:57:07 GMT
I prefer Hugo than Ambre

And with the strategy, if you hand Hugo try to use like 1-2pills, just try to minimize it at the 1st or 2nd round and save it to the latter round, coz with Hugo and the Montana Bonus, you have like 18attack advantage over your opponent, for a 6power card enemy, he has to put 3 or more pill just to defeat you]]>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:31:56 GMT]]>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:58:15 GMThttp://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=766270]]>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:45:25 GMT If you win with a SkrumxxT and Eris against a Mawpin and Pan or something, you will get very little points at the end of the match. So people generally keep their total stars in the deck around just above the ELO range (26-2. Also, ELO banned cards -2 points from the end of the match. Uppers are great because they have alot of 2hko's, speeding up the game.]]>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:14:34 GMTSun, 06 Jun 2010 17:42:37 GMT
I am currently using these decks http://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=1317833 and http://www.urban-rivals.com/presets/?id_preset=1317830 .

Go ahead and comment if you think these deck are not good enough and why

Please help,
MW_Pasha911]]>