40enTue, 19 Jun 2012 07:23:17 GMTTue, 19 Jun 2012 07:23:17 GMTSun, 17 Jun 2012 17:01:35 GMT
yep. auto play only makes sense with no pill and final round. everything else would solve a minor issue at the expense of creating new ones]]>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 07:14:31 GMTGreem still has the right to chose the card. part of his strategy. there could be times where attack manipulators, high powered card, low star cards still forces the opponent to pill an extra instead of using that pill for a valued fury.although, i see know reason for a winning player to be stalling unless he just wants to or blew his chances of winning.]]>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 04:31:49 GMT
i am agreeing to the zero pill autoplay. but a losing player is the that is poisoned by Greem could stall on purpose... or he could be thinking. no way to tell the difference... and therefore no autoplaying on his part]]>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:49:52 GMT
but the person who played Greem with all pillz will not be able to stall.. he cannot perform any other action, except for playing a 0 pilled card, which, would be autoplayed, to prevent the Greem player from stalling
who's stalling is the sole reason this thread ever came to be..]]>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:21:32 GMTThu, 14 Jun 2012 18:52:26 GMT so stallers can still stall

we shouldnt automate too many things for the simple reason that part of getting better at this game is trying to figure things out in your head....automating it will make people less aware of game mechanics.. and ultimately less skilled.

stallers will exploit this to stall if needed.

but here is one extreme that that shouldnt be automated. Greem hits round 1 with all pillz used. She is with 3 Drs and Defeat +life cards. the other player will not catch up lets say.... scenario 1 would just be to autoplay the next 3 rounds cause after all its is over really. or scenario 2, let the poisoned player think through all the possible situations of escaping the defeat.... he may not realize it is a sure loss for another 2 rounds, but he should be given that time to think it through.

that would be the extreme obviously
the other extreme would be the zero pillz scenario

the zero pill (for either side) autoplay in round 4 is possible without any issues for most people. and could probably be coded into the game without bugs.]]>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:08:39 GMT
You're logic is wrong, how could a 0 pillz autoplay kick in when someone has 1 pill left... the system wouldn't kick in and yes the round could be stalled..
or is that the loophole?]]>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:51:55 GMT after giving much taught, the 0 pillz autoplay has a minor loop hole. for example on the third round the player might save 1 pill for the final round. this may not trigger the system to autoplay. i wonder if a maximum total attack, and total maximum damage with and without fury of a player should be compared and then autoplayed but only applicable in the last round, hope this is not too complicated.]]>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:49:37 GMT the ELO mode has a lot of stallers, hoping you'll quit instead of waiting 2,5 minutes(!!!!!!) for a staller to play his or her last card

on the other hand, once you've played your card and you have to wait 2,5 minutes for a staller to play his or her card..
you've got time to read some-in-awesomesauce-covered subjects on the boards!

TraitorzZz; always making you look on the bright side of thingzZz xD
always]]>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:34:11 GMT

we've always envisioned that it would be the only option tó autoplay, because every other solution would get silly and too complicated..

I find it quite irritating to have to wait 1 and a half minutes for a stalling player to press play on his last remaining card, with no hope of winning with it..
that 1,5 minute could've been spent better versus another player..
would remove alot of stress too!]]>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:18:58 GMTWed, 13 Jun 2012 23:50:49 GMT

well put though. 0 pill can be autoplayed... anything else. let the stallers stall if they want to]]>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:01:06 GMTTue, 12 Jun 2012 18:43:00 GMTTue, 12 Jun 2012 10:36:16 GMTTue, 12 Jun 2012 10:29:19 GMTBeef, saying "I have no Beef with you" (har, har.)

In exchange, I got called a troll, a toxic person, and generally was told that everything I do is meant to ruin UR. I, uh, think I'll stick to my guild boards for now -- where it's safe...]]>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:56:26 GMT I have no idea what you two are talking about and this would've been nice to continue in your own private conversation
and no I don't care Ghelas BL'ed you, there's simply no excuse and I will refrain myself from commenting about how I've been BL'ed multiple times for letting my tongue run rampant in the way you two have been at it..

My 2 cents;
if a player is a 0 pillz, and it's his or her turn, the card should be played automatically
too many people stalling on their last card, while having 0 pillz
I'm not saying an automatic win, I'm saying an automatic play in the last round only, when someone takes at least 10 seconds to play their card...

do mind that UR is riddled with glitches and that a glitch in this update would cause a lot of harm to the gameplay if it went bad... although timing out is worse on a DT!!]]>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:12:19 GMT
You made a claim that stallers will be able to circumvent any system, but every time I've challenged you to explain how they will do that with no rules posted to describe the system, you've only deflected... Please, if you're serious about defending your claim, go over the steps you would take, as a staller, to do this?

There is nothing sneaky or underhanded, and nothing that constitutes baiting, about not sharing the rules with you first. For example, we know that player profile information and password are stored by the UR staff on a server somewhere. That's all we know about that. If additional information was released about it, it would only make the system less secure.

It's true that I feel that UR needs to change some practices, but in some cases, like in the profile/password example above, transparency is not what's needed.

And, in case you're wondering, I do have a very specific set of rules in mind. If you will allow the conversation to continue on this forum, I will happily post them up for everyone to see.]]>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:21:19 GMT
for a guy who has me blacklisted, you sure do like to directly talk to me on public forums.

sorry mate im not biting on your bait for the "fool proof" hypothetical system that you were suppose to provide originally.
and even if there was a system... and for some strange reason you got nailed for violating it... We both know you would be on these forums trying to rally a handful of people about how UR lacks transparency and is autocratic and punishes people without telling them where the lines are. Do a search of your previous posts ghelas... they are there for all to see. Or if you want i'll provide links in case you forgot you ever made those kinds of posts in the past.

my PM is always open, continue the conversation there if you want, but baiting on the public forums will now cease.]]>