40enThu, 24 Jan 2013 13:59:43 GMTThu, 24 Jan 2013 13:59:43 GMTBangers (which is way overdue), Skeelz, Frozn, and Pussycats.]]>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:19:27 GMTVirginia would be better put as a 7/10 or maybe even an 8, but 9 is too high for my prefferance. Sakrohm was already a great clan B4 this, and Virginia doesn't exactly make it a whole lot better for me(a bit though). 7/6 soa is most definitely a fair stat range that many 5*s have. Part of the reason Hawk is banned is because he has 8 power, and 7 power is a bit easier to counter.

The reason I put 6 was because Stella can fill in for Virginia in nearly any deck. Of course some people would kill to have SOA. She was a nice card, but not worthy of the "Beast" title I hear a lot of people saying.

Between a deck with Morphun, GraksmxxT, Miss Stella, Jackie Cr, Dorian, Herman, Lady, and the final card being either Stella or Virginia, There will be little change in regards of the success of the deck in a Survivor format. Both would get far and have potential to rack up the clintz.

As far as I can say, she is good but not a beast. To quote -Steel-, "Virginia is a decent card and there is nothing to complain over her!". Those words definitely express a good definition of her. Although to be fair, while Virginia is more stable than Fuzz, Fuzz threatens the opponent more(easier to beat, but hurts more if defeated from 8 damage).

Although I suppose it might be fun to 2HKO with Jackie/Hawk and Virginia... Haha.
]]>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:25:59 GMTVirginia is awesome, definitely not a 6/10 (what were you thinking), for me she's more likely a 9/10. With one more damage or one more power she would have been crazy, this way she will still be used a lot and still probably banned often... And there are reasons to use Sakrohm over Junkz! It's mainly about the life gap, there's Jautya, Murray, Ngrath, Uranus, Aleister, which means you can win the game in 2 rounds, even in 1 round if you get lucky... I don't see this ever happening with Junkz.

And I think Dave is great, and Ulu Watu needed a 2* better than Tiago to make a good mono deck ]]>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:14:31 GMTVirginia is more stable than Fuzz and like i already said, +1 damage with +1★ is normal and Virginia is a great card.
Sure Sakrohm lack a few decent cards, but there are many clans that do.
Nightmare lack a stable 5★ for ELO, Uppers lack a nice 2★, Frozn lack pretty much everything, Junkz lack lifegap... but thats what weaknesses every clan has, mostly just fair.
After all, Virginia is a decent card and there is nothing to complain over her!]]>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 08:09:11 GMT my comment is for Standard
I forgot to said earlier
and i already said Mok is OK]]>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 01:25:46 GMTSakrohm because Junkz is just straight up better (unless of course Uranus is better). I know it is not that good to compare cards across clans 'oh I am not going to use my Qubik in my Sakrohm deck blahblah you suck' no thats not a valid argument. if that argument works then even if Virginia was something crappy like 7/5 SoA you can STILL say that.....

but seriously, compared to Fuzz and Qubik she is just not... that good. Sakrohm still lacks a truly decent 2*, Anti-SoA capabilities and the nuke (Jautya is just too fragile).

oh and she is definitely better than stellas... i mean stellas are just pathetic... (talking about elo) survivals a different story

@prince GHEIST 2 stars are fine.... i personally like Elke, but you can also try the almight c3r0 d34d and cmon Mok has 8 power for a 2 star and 4 damage, what else do you want.]]>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:11:02 GMTPussycats? Virginia can be dr'ed]]>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:49:18 GMTFrozn. ""]]>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:05:01 GMTGHEIST please!!
Mok and Elke are OK.
But Wurmhol!
Come on! give a GHEIST user some fun.
Its ok now bcos u already release many card with Stop]]>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:15:53 GMTVirginia "okay"
Qubik is awesome and 1 damage/power less for one star is usual. So how is Virginia not awesome? She is a perfect card for Survivor T2 and makes a huge threat because she is stable and cant be reduced except for soa clans reducers like Jeena or Bristone, which rarely are found in said mode.
And here again for dummies: Virginia is like the overpowered and ELO banned Hawk, just with one power less!

Roger and Dave both are decent cardd and will be used often, though i think Roger could have been 8/3, since the clan still is eaten alive by Uppers, All Stars and similar.

Rhody just is a waste of space...]]>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 05:07:53 GMTSat, 12 Jan 2013 04:10:11 GMT Are you sure you didn't confuse Sakrohm with Junkz? Because Fuzz and Qubik aren't good for Sakrohm decks.]]>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:02:22 GMTSakrohm havent found their "thing" yet. Every clan ha something big to make them stand out, Nightmare are more about life and poison whereas prianhas are more about pills. Sakrohm dont have anything huge (besides the 2 damage reducers) that make them stand out from Sentinel or Junkz... the few +life cards they have are really low things like +2 life, the major one is life per damage which would be alright if there were more +life cards in Sakrohm... ANyone else feel this way or is it just me? i just dont see why people would use Sakrohm over Sentinel or Junkz...]]>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 01:58:00 GMTSat, 12 Jan 2013 01:15:10 GMTVirginia: 7/6 Soa 5* for Sakrohm- Hmm, not bad. Considering her competition however, she wasn't a very needed staple in high starred Sakrohm decks. I would personally take the stellas over her, graks, and probably several others. I do suppose that she is useful, but not really groundbreaking. 6/10

Roger: 7/4 3* for Berzerk w/ copy bonus- Well, he's not over or underpowered, so that's good. He's average, and to some people, he could be a very useful 3*. I would say he's my 2nd favorite in the clan for 3*s perhaps, but again, nothing groundbreaking. 7/10

Dave: 8/1 for ulu watus w/ +2 life- My personal favorite of the release. While the Ulu watus had plenty 2*s to deal with, UR decided to give us another. This guy defeats Bree hands-down to me. Taigo and Gabrielle are arguable, but that's because they all play different roles. IMO, he was a nice choice, but at the same time, the ulu watus were perfectly fine without another 2* for now. What more, they may be getting lots of life gain, but again, their damage is pretty low, so against soa clans you may have to win 3 matches and possibly fury to get in that win(They also don't have much attack manipulation aside from Taigo or Sandy who is situational). 7/10

Rhody: 3/4 P and D +2 Uppers-Bad. Bad. Bad. Oh well, not all cards can be good. Rubee is hands down better, and others IMO. Uppers is ok though, as Oxen, rubee, Harold, Pallack, etc. were already at least decent 3*s.

This was a meh release. Hopefully next release is better.]]>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:00:21 GMTFri, 11 Jan 2013 21:52:25 GMTRhody... I don't mind weak cards. Doesn't bother me; I'll avoid them and not complain. Missions with awful cards, however, that kind of thing just darkens my day. ]]>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 21:45:39 GMTRhody! We haven't received a beginner card in awhile]]>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:59:38 GMTVirginia and Roger are now staples for my decks.

Dave is usable but Rhodys not too good.]]>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:36:55 GMTVirginia is good but not great. i to would use Fuzz over her]]>