40enFri, 23 Mar 2007 14:28:56 GMTFri, 23 Mar 2007 14:28:56 GMTELO mode is meant for stratedgists who want a fun balanced game that favors players who build and play smartly instead of just spending the most money on the most over powered cards. My guess is the majority of people who are voting against having stats changed are people who don't even play ELO mode but play regular and don't want their powerful regular cards getting weakened so that the ELO players have more options. Its a shame it looks like ELO mode is going to suffer because regular mode is more popular, but I understand their point of view, they spent alot of money on those cards, they don't ELO so they don't care if they're banned there, they just want them to continue to be ridiculously amazing in regular.

Continuing the other subject I would LOVE if once card was max leveled you could pay a small ctz fee to "advanced level" it which would allow you to choose which level of it to use whenever adding it to a deck.]]>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:25:57 GMTFri, 23 Mar 2007 13:08:37 GMTFri, 23 Mar 2007 12:50:03 GMTELO:
Game is more flexible with it. But it is very expensive and time consuming to buy non leveled cards I need to play. I personally prefere to have possibility play not fully evolved cards in ELO. But I want some possibility to downgrade level of my fully evolved character. For example sent my character in some brainwosh therapy
And pay 100 clintz for level down.]]>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:49:06 GMT
Like most projects certain things happen that you simply have to accept and work with, not against. So I think instead of working against the older stats cards -- that no longer fit into the plan -- you should work with them and modify the plan to fit the cards.

Just my 3 cents. I like potatoes.]]>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:24:56 GMTELO play. Would that required those who want to play in that mode to buy more cards EVO them before hand or buy them from the market fully evolved if they can? That be would good for both the market player and ELO player and the site owners as well. Just my counterpoint to the matter. As far as making too strong cards into collectors then making weaker, I HIGHLY disagree. We need more ORIGINAL cards with more maybe a couple more abilities developed. Rhashing the the old is not really a good thing.]]>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:05:09 GMT || Prysm & Atryx_evo---- 100 % right ! ||
=======================

I have spent alot of money so far getting my collection and good cards, I earned the right for stronger cards because i SUPPORTED the game, I choose to SUPPORT for the reason to be a collector as well have better cards then NON_SUPPORTERS of game ! .... i feel same way > if so is the case then I want to be refunded for every powerful card I paid for. I bought them because they were strong, or if played correctly could become strong... i didnt spend 400.00 so far on a game to be stripped of my hard earned money to be (= )to those who dont support your game.... better yet could easily come down to simple disbute inquriy to credit card company & paypal for full reinburment due to items not recieved/ changed/ stripped for what originally was paid for.............. better yet just refund me and take everything back and let me rethink my supporting options while i start my game over....... ]]>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 07:47:39 GMT
1) Keep unevolved cards in ELO mode. Strategy is strategy, to UNLOCK the card's powers is an Urban Rivals saying; There are decks that revolve around unevolved cards which premmy players (market users) often play and dominate the ELO rankings. If you want to be a contender in this game, you should commit to it and buy credits at the shop. This is my honest opinion, because the growth as a player is greatly excelled once you buy credits and play the Market. Like a saying before, there are 2 kinds of players in Urban; The ELO player and the Market Player. A Great player is both.

2) For people who have spend tons of credits to buy that CR card that suddenly becomes a weaker version of it's original state is unacceptable and sad. Keep the cards in the collection w/o changes; When UR releases new cards, I trust them not to make a Skullclamp; ex) I would like to make Tanaereva into a CR card yet still legal in ELO, then make a new weaker Tanaereva. Just like Berserkgirl Cr.]]>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 04:51:02 GMTELO mode (2595 votes)
I want to authorize all the characters in ELO mode and change the stats of the characters that are too strong.
42%
I don't want to change the stats of the characters and I want to ban from ELO mode those that are too strong
58%
i think to ban some character`s would win because it`s 58% and to change stat`s only42%]]>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:22:48 GMTELO....the next poll perhaps?]]>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:18:14 GMTThu, 22 Mar 2007 19:26:59 GMTThu, 22 Mar 2007 15:04:12 GMTELO play.

I will also add though that I've always felt and agree that non-fully evolved cards should not be allowed in elo play or should count as their max level when determining total elo level count.]]>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:52:07 GMT I think that banning characters is inevitable, but it is not the best solution right now.
Some cards are too strong, but mostly it are not the collectors, but the cards like tanae and wee,
that make a deck too strong. If there was an extra restriction, like not too high level per clan,
or all full stars, then it would be more balanced. BTW: the pussycat dolls aren't too strong,
try fang pi clan or La Junta, they're very effective against the Pussycats! BTW: don't spent too much
money on elo, with all those new cards, every week there is a clan better for elo, just buy cards
to collect them ]]>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:12:04 GMTelo.

I am in favor of keeping the card stats unchanged.

I disagree that Pussycat bonus is too strong. Their bonus is only good if they LOSE.]]>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:30:28 GMT]]>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:12:29 GMT
Changing a card's stats is like making a new card with the same illustration/name as an old one. Ban and new cards is better ]]>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:11:53 GMT
First of all banning cards is neither ridiculous nor avoidable: it is necessery. In an evolving TCG as Urban Rivals, with new cards being published each week, it is inevitable that some of the cards are imbalanced or make other cards imbalanced when in combination with them. No amount of planning from the creators can prevent this; and especially in Urban Rivals where we have new additions many times a month, I would say that the creators are doing a terrific job keeping the game balanced with so few in number banned cards as there are now. In other TCGs in order to avoid imbalancies they publish new card sets every one/two months and quite often permit play of only the most recent cards in tournaments, just to keep those overpowered combinations at bay. Do you prefer that from banned cards? Personally I don't.]]>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:01:13 GMTELO yet because i am building and testing my deck for it, but right now i am wondering if all the real cash i just spent to buy ctz to get the big cards are going to be made useless by being banned or powerless by being reduced. I spent the money so i could get the powerful cards so i would stand a tiny chance at competeing in this game. If the cards i just bought are made less powerful or banned then i think i want a refund of the HUNDREDS of US dollars i spent in the last 3 weeks and ill leave the game.... as well as all the friends i talked into joining. This is just wrong ! Had i known you were going to do this i would have never spent the real cash and neither would any of my friends.

Thats just my opinion for what its worth.]]>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:28:13 GMTDon´t play them. I play Junta mixed with 2 Montana and I win more than I loose. Are we all wimps that cannot handle a loss or do we take up the challenge and play with the cards we have been dealt. Please this is a card game you can get a bad hand. If you are a new player to the game then do not play elo untill you have got the cards you need to make up a good deck. this will also encourage players to buy credits so they can get better and more expensive cards cheaper than in the market the upportunity to sell off the ones you do not need at the market. it is a win win situation for the game developers so why chamge it?]]>