<![CDATA[Urban-Rivals - Message Board - Introductions and Recruitment: ELO time-out question ??]]>40enSat, 08 Jul 2006 10:02:43 GMT<![CDATA[jackocomp]]>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:02:43 GMT<![CDATA[Fraggle]]>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 04:53:58 GMT protection&quot;.]]><![CDATA[AOD_CKANE]]>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:47:03 GMTELO system.

If anyone can exploit a hole without much technical merit then it's considered a severe security breach (at my job atleast).]]><![CDATA[Fraggle]]>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 13:47:57 GMT Timeout in ELO is very wrong because players use(d) it for rating protection. In normal game, it's less a matter because you'll still get your experience.]]><![CDATA[hudy]]>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:25:48 GMTELO staff. it happens everywhere around the game.

I played player Called PauFouf or something like that. He put all in one card, lost and? time out

I lost everything and he is laughing of me right now
]]><![CDATA[Fraggle]]>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:20:37 GMT mobile player, but we have a system in place that will inflict penalty if
too many timeout in ELO are happening with a specific player in a short
period.
Also, we expect people in ELO to spot out the &quot;bad sheep&quot; and avoid
them..]]><![CDATA[Scooter]]>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 20:35:18 GMTELO and I was about to win a match, when my opponent timed out. I noticed my ELO rank didn't change and I assume his didn't either.

If ELO is supposed to be the more strategic mode for the best players, how could this be allowed to happen? Or is it actually a &quot;strategy&quot; to time out when you're about to lose?

Am i wrong about this? I hope I am. If you can just time out to save your rating, that's just plain ridiculous.]]>