I really cant seem to get it Lamar Cr is the only staple 5* allstars got besides oyoh so if you want to use a 5* you totally lack freedom in your choice. Also his stats are far from too strong compare him to lou or fuzz or cliff ... He was propably overpowered 2 years ago when he got banned but by now hes not much more then an average 5* (he is strong, yes, but permaban worthy? I dont think so ... )
Id really appreciate if the staff could reconsider some of their old permabans in elo. As the metagame changes through new card releases the bans should change aswell.
Lamar cr doesnt deserve a ban, he should be on a level with copper. Often banned by the users, sometimes banned by the staff.
Thanks for the pointless comment "my hero"
also: i already stated that such a form of comparision makes no sense, i know that copper isnt necessairely better then lamar just because he wins 1v1. read what i wrote, i explicitely pointed that out
besides: I think striker is a whole different story because for a 4star in a clan like allstars, 6power and soa are really insane. lamar cr gains an improved lifegap but no additional help in ensuring that lifegap in comparision to striker. I believe that +2 damage at the cost of an additional star are a negative trade off aslong as your base power isnt really exceptional (in jackie cr 's case i believe the level 4 version is by far more viable then the 3 star version since you can rely on her winning her fight anyway so you want her to deal as much damage as possible)
in lamars case that something different. 6power is not much for a 5* and just because its allstars that doesnt change anything.
He's band as he's a Cr - an old Cr - and not many have him or can afford him. His stats and ablity go well with his clan bonus, making him unbeatable i most cases and Dr's cannot to alot to defend from his 8 damage, his basically the same as Guru and Vickie in nearly all situations. End of story !
what exactly is your argumentation? If you mean elo is about everyone having the same chances and thus expensive cards should be banned, why is marlysa cr allowed?
besides, he is NOT the same as vickie, holy crap, how did you get that idea Oo his bonus means that at 5 pillz or higher, he catches up in attack with the -12 attack from vickie. 5, thats a real lot. considering that vickie also has 1 power advantage over him, what makes you say hes basically the same?
and about guru: no comment, hes just so incredibly much stronger in 99% of the cases, these 2 cant be compared at all.
and about dr's not doing a lot: A uranus turns him 6:3, pretty poor imo. Compare this too fuzz whos damage can barely be decreased at all (by some gheists and roots and all the pussycats) making his damage a LOT more staple. worst things that can happen are 4 damage (against jeena), 5 damage vs bristone and besides these theres nothing thats played which reduces fuzz's damage underneath the 6. So explain to me: Why, following your argumentation, is fuzz rarely banned and lamar cr perma banned?
Lamar is a lot more solid than striker when it comes to getting his attack through. There are tons of piranas and nightmare out there so striker stands a pretty poor chance against cards like tyd. Lamar on the other hand can handle these cards without too much trouble. As for damage, It isn't that hard to dodge a DR when you can take on anything so lamar is just as good as striker if not better. BTW 2 raw points difference generally equates to one *.