First of all, i want to clarify that i'm not one of those players who comes to the forum blaming the staff for everything, neither one of those who wants huge daily rewards even tho my scores aren't on the top of the table. I will just share what i think survival could be offering to be a better gamemode.
Starting off, one topic i believe everyone agrees, its the clintz/vicotry rewards.
Years have passed, the market prices got HUGEEEE increase and the rewards stay the same.
According to the survival rewards, if you reach 44 wins in a row ( something that since the beggining of UR only 18 people got) your jackpot would be 21,135 clintz. Is that bad? Of course it is.
1º : No one in todays meta seem to get no where near that number ( Average in this days would be around 20 wins wich has 4,135 clintz jackpot!)
2º : 21,135 is useless in todays market for such a crazy win streak.... Imagine if you were a "survival only" player and you were trying to buy a Big 5, it would take you around 952 days (doing something only 18 players did in 12 years) to buy a card someone who plays tourney could buy in a couple of months by playing 2 or 3 toruneys a day.
You took part in the latest Daily Tournament and finished 133rd with 11 Battle Points.
Too bad, you didn’t manage to finish in the top third of the ranking table
You won 3 665 Clintz! )
if i lost 2 games every 2 hours in a tourney i would get around 4 k clintz! that == survival daily top player....
There shouldn’t be any card permanent banned in survivor since some cards already are DT banned and only allowed in Dark Corners. However, I think the old ELO system where players were able to vote which card to ban for a week would be perfect to introduce in Survivor.
DarkDemon: No this wouldn't be perfect in T1/T2 Survivor. T1 and T2 should stay what they always were. Just a stars per deck restriction.
But why not ask for ELO Survivor with a rotating cycle of the certain rooms (Dark Corners etc.)?
So even the best players still have a chance to play every card the game has to offer.
Of course cards shouldnt be banned, as someone who self proclaimed himself as "a person who actually plays survivor" you dont seem to be aware that survival is the only game mode, where you can play with an objective with all cards.
And concerning the fact that you only play survival to get credits because that "is what survivor is for" i will just post the first sentence of the oficial surivor page :
"You must strike as much victories in a row as you can to earn a lot of Clintz."
Sorry if people here trying to get somewhere dont "actually play survival".
At some point DT didn't have bans and now there are dozens that make the mode more balanced and competitive, ELO without banned cards was a crazy idea and now you can play up to 300 with any card. Survivor isn't balanced and it needs some bans, at least weekly like DarkDemon pointed.
I guess you are right about the mode, I've been playing Survivor and earning hundreds of credits but I was wrong, I should've been playing for the clintz Staff should remove credits prizes and give clintz instead to speed up inflation and kill the market
Listen to this Naarcho guy, he knows what he is speaking about.
And I don't get it, your main idea in first post is- in survivor you get too small prices and speak ONLY about clintz rewards?
Survivor have tokenz and credits prices as well which is much greater than clintz rewards.