Nice t1 deck. Why don't you add an extra 2* and make it t2 you can get more points.
Nice deck could do well.
Montana have low damage so i think it will be good to combine them with Sakhrom that have many Damager Card (or Life Gainer to make a gap ), good for T1
Uppers + Sakhrom i think will be more stable in T2
It's uh, actually not the computer's fault. I believe, in this case, your internet is causing you the time-outs. As long as you don't have like 500 Mhz of Ram or 1 Ghz of Cpu, you should be fine in the computer department.
I typically play between 20 and 24 matches in a tourney. If i could win all of them, id be in top 5 every time, as it is i usually have six to eight losses, so i am almost just around ten some times below but more often just above.
Point being: twenty matches do happen, and four hundred points is a very possible achievement.
I kill them rescues with jungo and bangers nuff said
i just has trouble against anyone who can read through my pilling strategy
Evrything works fine with me
I don't think level has anything to with anything. It goes like this, lets say 40 vs 24. You add them together (64), the 40 has 40/64 chance of winning and your opponent 24 has 24/64. So you have about 62% chance of winning and your opponent 38%. Random is underrated, it all evens out, the winning because of random and losing because of it. Random has brought me at least 15 daily tournaments
Actually just seen this thread too that'll possibly make more sense than my mumbling:
I think its worthwhile to run at least 1 staff banned, 2 comes down to which cards you're running. When I run Rescue in DT, I run Marco but not Alec Cr.
The general solution to such problems is to clean the cache of your broser, update the flash and java versions, and restart the browser.
In 90% of the cases it solves the problem.
Hi, new player (22) i have played this deck in DT [Hugo - Avola- Edd -Spiaghi -Oscar - Ficcanaso -Prince Jr- Filomena]
now i have some new card and some clintz put aside, for DT what do you suggest me? keeping straight whit this deck (maybe mona over hugo and sharon over ficcanaso) or playng a mono uppers7hugo - uppers? and in the case of the uppers witch deck will be good? i aldredy have Nellie dorian and jonas
Cley ain't useless without his bonus. I use him as a splash card on my tournament decks sometimes.
@kris: every clan that isn't manipulation (power or attack) have an inherit weakness against SoA (their bonus doesn't help offset the SOA clan's ability) and every clan that isn't All Stars and is manipulation has inherit weakness against SOB (usually the stats are lower/ability not very good compared to SOB cards)
Having a weak spot doesn't mean you always lose those game, but that's the metagame in a shell.
SOA>non-manips>SOB>manips>SOA, with manips>non-manips and SOA>SOB
Oh I was wrong about turning off Missions, forget it.
Judging Kolos is a case where the pill-for-pill analysis fails completely. Kolos isn't about grinding an advantage, its about OHKO or mega bluff to drain all your pills. If you heavy pill Gatline vs bluffed Kolos = you are down 7 pills for 5 damage. You lose. Low pilled Gatline vs OHKO Kolos = you lose. You want something that can cover the 60 atk cheaply and do good amount of damage. Askai is a card that fits the bill, the Junta 5*s are another (Emeth or Nagatar are both good).
Pill for Pill analysis is for those cards that are designed to grind advantage, and with similar damage. Is it even relevant that 1* Ceasar beats Randy pill for pill? Odds are the Randy player will throw a few extra pills anyway.