Ya, 5-3 or 6-2 both work. It just depends on the other clan you are using.
Upgrade some other card.
@Neo : I didn't adress it because you already hit the nail on the head.
If she was 3 we'd be screwed.
If she was 2 we'd be ultra screwed.
If she was 5 she'd be the best 5 * ELO card for Skeelz (debatably ) but would take up too many stars in most cases.
The thing is, at 4 Stars, she's what she Needs to be, strong and borderline OP .
My point being is that Xingshu 's level isn't a huge factor, but it is relevant. As a 4 * she is good / borderline OP but as a 5 * she would be about average.
Point I'm making here is that Xingshu's stats are on par for her level, and as they should be. But people tend to overlook the things that keep it from being banworthy because. . . well, who knows why.
Yeah, he's actually not that bad.
Kitsune , you're here, I saw bison around, and ghelas is an admin now.
All we need
People who use dead internet memes as their avatar should be euthanized IMO
I loled at post 52
I probably wouldn't play GHEIST/Nightmare without them. They are fairly staple. Wait till they're unbanned.
Or - 2opp damage
Don't play Piranas/Nightmare. You are better off playing Piranas mono or Nightmare/Junkz. See, they have the same bonus, so you risk 3/1 hands for nothing.
Jungo could work well too?
11* or 14* aren't half decks. True they consist of 4 cards, which is half of 8, but in terms of stars, one "half" is rather too much bigger than the other "half" to call either of them "half". I see what you mean, it is an issue of naming
Anyway, I agree peeps would run 2 beastly all stops, which is why I suggested ban Curlix who is way more OP than Shakra. And the appearance of your Shakra will only happen a tiny portion of the time.
If you want to talk about Roots bans/unbans, there's a thread elsewhere now, but I'll just say that Lou would be a fairer unban than Shakra and you certainly couldn't allow both unbanned anyway so Shakra is a moot point. But you can easily argue Shakra should return and Curlix should go
Yeah I'm running this, its actually pretty good, and the 4x 2* hand is pretty strong
The late Kefalo once referred to the Huracan as a clan of bricks, as every card was something you threw at your opponent and hopefully would smack him in the jaw. In my (arrogant) opinion, the Riots are very similar to them, but ultimately a step up in terms of card variety and tactics. Cards like Copernica, Hartnell, Octana, Farman, Boomstock, Geo, and Molder are still very much bricks, but the Riots also pack a number of walls with cards like Van Wesel, Grouchy, Lindsey, Kenjy, and Reeplay (also kinda Geo again). Lastly, Pericles makes for one of the greatest mind-game opportunities this game has to offer, while also tentatively filling in both of the previous categories.
All in all, I like the clan. Lots of potential. I feel like they would go well with a GHEIST half (granted, I have no clue what any good GHEIST halves are), and your Standard Vortex Half (Cyb Liha/C Wing/Dagg/T Gaank) would probably synergize well too.
I used this deck myself this week and it got me to 1300 ELO. I'm afraid to keep playing though
Oh, Glorg or Magenta . . .
Idk , but myself, I've always preferred Magenta. Glorg is mainly good when he has his Bonus and ability, otherwise :
Glorg < Magenta
I am probably not the only one who isn't clear how these abilities work; I've only seen Dawn and Earl in ELO and the other players have always played them first round. That's why I thought Earl's ability was like Eyrik's, since it reduced power by 1.