@nayrSlayer your completely right. on the way the point system should be tweaked you should lose less points for fighting some one lower then your zones but if you win aginst that stronger deck witch since its lower zone would be much stronger should give more points for the game if you win.
a point tweak like this would make the mode more fun but be harder for staff to do all the math. may be you lose half the points for each zone lower then you to a point.
if your zone say tower fighting a dark corner should half the points lost if you lose. double if you win cause that's one up hill battle. an odd's are you will lose with a +80% change of it being a loss.
Yea, state of features generally tested in beta sites not the replacement of mayor game mode.
Just realized this pattern. My guild mate who reached 602 won 28 points on his last match, and his current score is being shown as 28. Similarly, you won 40 points but your score is being shown as 40 so all scores are actually showing what the player won in his last match, which is why one of my friend's score is - 9
I wish they would make it if you make it were you play what 2 zones away from the zone your in
say your in zone
3- Danger zone
you are more likely to play 2- Chocomuscle ring or 4-EFC Tower has a 72% for a mach making an 28% chance match making for 1- Dark corners or 5- Polit arena that way it balance out for players much better.
I'm Lovin' It!!! because I get to use this deleted even if it is just for a Zone or two
You have to play 5 rounds a day or you will lose. at the end of the week the one with most post win's. its really simple. just make sure to play your 5 games a day or you really lose points for it.
Nobody cares , u just holded the game together , but now dead all round
Damn these Hyper Links!
Hes not but he dose prove if we nerf all the other leaders they can all be used in elo. but heavy Nerf.
john doom is not hard to beat that an he cant ko with out fury so hes not really op. hes just irritating like a rash that wont go away.
The Bangers deck I said btw is a 2/2/2/3/3/4/4/5 which looks like it would deal low damage(idk, I always feel having too much 2* would make less damage) but their 2* damage output is surprising for not being in La junta but that's just my Opinion.
I actually tried an Upper/Frozn Deck and it does well. I use Aaron, Yod, Lowki, Haaken/T-We-1 and Josephine/Maurice, Rubie/Christelle, Salstberg/2* Gina Glitt, Jose Star/Gail Ld. I would use Stompah over aaron if he was free but Aaron is actually good tbh.
Ah just a note, I use Gail LD instead of Wendel, but I didn't include Gail since you don't have her
They were banned for a reason. Certain un-evolved cards have significant advantages. And it not only encourages price hikes for certain cards at certain levels, but it also influences bans both permanent and weekly.
Things that can be the case:
-Turn off random mode (turn no-random on)
-Check what card has the least amount of stars (that card wins)
-Then check who was first (if stars are equal) (that card wins)
-Check if opponent has solomon (if he does he wins)
Both swap glenn out or any other less important card
Problem release stronger cards mean other's get pushed out cause of a price gap. for newer players. cant afford it.
an older cards get pushed farther way.
what we really need to do is go through all the cards 1 by one an see witch ones are to powerful compared to there counter parts an witch ones were banned to see if they don't need to be banned. an re-balance elo it self.
i personally don't see the problem with 50/50 cards they all ways been the turn around cards to me that can win a game for you. an all cards have these 50/50 cards so no clan was every left out in that area. but as soon a soon 50/50 card came out all hell broke loose. witch never made sense to me.
I thought 50/50 cards gave the game a mechanic alone its own that said you winning now but i can turn it around if i play this card right. witch all other card games have millions of those 50/50 cards in them. an they do really well.
prizes should be slightly high in elo yes make's player work for it but not to high or people with money over free players will be unfair an drive new players an free players away from elo then you have only 100 playing a week an that's not good.
Well if you think about the point system works well it be only 2 point card since im prity sure the better 2* will have more then 2 points on it. incourage play of cards like Globumm.