monday 27/02/2012

Http:// try this smiley

sunday 26/02/2012

With the current, enormous, card pool a lot more monoclan decks are viable. I remember when I started this game, and for a very long time, monoclan decks were not possible as we didn't have enough tools for it. The arrival of rescue created one of the first competitive monoclan decks.

Even the creation of the rescue clan shows the overall attitude towards deck building at the time. It was considered that running a monoclan deck was a disadvantage as you didn't have access to everything that you needed... and so cards like marco and alex were made to "compensate" this disadvantage smiley

In time it became quite clear that running monoclan decks, with the right "tools" was an advantage, as you didn't have to consider the luck involved in getting the bonuses.

With 4/4 decks you have a lot of times a 3/1 split of cards which can ruin that game altogether. For example I had twice today edwin without bonus against roots or gheist... when building the deck I considered edwin as a solid card against SOA clans as he is not normally affected by them, but without his bonus he was the weak link that cost me those games.

IMO an ever expanding card pool would have eventually resulted in almost only monoclan decks... as every clan would have eventually gotten everything it needs, damage reduction, SOA, SOB, atk manip etc. in the same time being "safe" against the luck of not getting one of the bonuses.

4 cards at 2 stars is a little too risky IMO, it would be too dependent on the luck of the draw

Personally I'm not a huge fan of charlie anymore, I would much rather use muze and buff the nightmare side
wanda and brittany are my favorite 2 star pussycats but it depends on that week metagame, wanda may be more useful than wanda in weeks with a lot of SOA

if you "free" 2 stars by replacing charlie with muze you can than improve the nightmare side, for example pan or edwin instead of sheitane and karrion instead of glorg, also if you already use pussycats as dmg reduction you may want to consider replacing artus with phyllis or mawpin ( although mawpin I find to be a little less reliable)

Ok deck. I would personally change WoodXsxt to Anakrohm and Stanly to Petra.

Interesting deck. I would personally change Ficcanaso to prince jr

I don't think it stacks.

Nice deck. I would personally change Miho to Melanie.

Seems fine when its cards arn't ELO banned.

If you want a deck that is easy to understand and maybe easier to master than others, try mono rescue, there are many variations, as some of their cards get banned each week.

Overall we have each week a number of rescue players in top 100, including this week. They have some counters to spyke and are also ok vs SOA clans.

On the other hand, as I've told you in another thread you made with the same subject... you need to consider the arrival of standard and if you are on a tight budget you might want to wait until then

saturday 25/02/2012


Many say that Vortex compliment Junkz because of the extra pill manipulation and attack manipulation. Me? I'm an aggressive player, I'll say compliment Vortex with something that can hit really hard, enough to help you win the game along with some DRs. This way you can pill hard with Vortex and even if you lose, you get your pillz back.

150k is a lot, I suggest:

Cyb Lhia, C Wing, Dagg, X-0DUS,

to compliment with either Fei, Heitachi, Kusuri, Zhu Tang or Spyke. Melaine, Elvis, Lola.

Hope this helps!

friday 24/02/2012



I've run into a lot of nightmare this week, but they haven't been that troublesome. Berzerk and skeelz haven't given me any problems either but piranha and junks have.

Any advice?

It seems a little top-heavy. Even though Eloxia has nice synergy with Berzerk, her use in this deck seems a little predictable... Why not swap her out for Greem? Drawing a "heavy poison" card along with a powerful wall creates a huge threat for your opponent, and the poison will usually help you win the game if you can land it in any turn 1-3, as long as your wall has round 4 covered. Use your extra star to fill out your deck with another strong card -- there's so many to chose from, I won't even bother listing them.

For me, in every half deck w/ piranas i always put raeth and hawkins. up to you with the 2 more. smiley

thursday 23/02/2012

I like the Montana I've mentioned, earlier. Vito and Desmond are both great Spyke-fighters. As an added bonus, they go through most DR, and Vito goes through Lola as well!

wednesday 22/02/2012

I dont know how you guys. I have tried them in many different decks and they are just not workng. In fact they are totaly worthless and i do not suggest to use them at all in elo if you dont want to loose 2 many games... Ii havent faced pussycats for a while. Even if i face some pussycats deck there is no problem of winning them.
1) Jayzel. Revenge SOA means, you can use her at second, third or last round. and also you must sacrifice a card wich makes her extremly predictable. 7 power easey beatable, 4 damage, just dont scare me. BAD really BAD card
2)Cherry is a very tricky card. It may seem a good card but actually she s worthless for elo with 14 lifepoints. Even if you pass in 90% of the cases you will get only 4 life gap (sometimes even less), wich is not not enough to win a game.

The problem of pussycats, they are not flexble. 2 many cards easey beat almost all pussycats cards. SOA kills their good abilities. And else new abilities defeat + - life, protection damage. Well i would say pussycats bonus just lost its purpose.

tuesday 21/02/2012

Its all down to personal preference so using both and seeing which one works best for you is probally a good idea.

monday 20/02/2012

Lol why say sorry for posting your deck on the fourms. Its what there there for.

Nice deck. I would personally change Na Boh to Wakai. Also this week due to him being banned i would change Qubik to Gibson.

p.s well done on getting 1425 ELO

Create a subject